Ruth M. Williams

5.1k total citations
103 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Ruth M. Williams is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth M. Williams has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 43 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 34 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Ruth M. Williams's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (44 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (40 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (31 papers). Ruth M. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (44 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (40 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (31 papers). Ruth M. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Ruth M. Williams's co-authors include Herbert W. Hamber, M. Roček, Tatjana Sauka‐Spengler, Tsvi Piran, P. A. Collins, Philip A. Tuckey, Ron H. Stead, Upeka Senanayake, John W. Barrett and Daria Gavriouchkina and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Nature Genetics and The Journal of Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Ruth M. Williams

101 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Ruth M. Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.3k
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.1k
  • Molecular Biology 654
  • Genetics 175
Replace Charles D. Lane with:
Charles D. Lane United States
Thomas W. Grimm Germany
C. Linder United States
Jean Thierry‐Mieg United States
Satoshi Adachi Japan
Michele Caselle Italy
Masashi Kimura Japan
Li‐Xin Li China
Guy D. Moore Canada
Thomas Dauser United States
Charles D. Lane United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ruth M. Williams
Ruth M. Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ruth M. Williams
Ruth M. Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth M. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth M. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth M. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth M. Williams. The network helps show where Ruth M. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth M. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth M. Williams. Ruth M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 36
2 13
3 8
4 15
5 93
6 58
7 81
8 67
9 11
10 173
11 1
12 1
13 2
14 100
15 12
16 7
17 44
18 46
19 5
20 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026