Paul R. Brook

7.4k citations
23 papers · 346 indexed · h-index 9

Paul R. Brook

23 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers

Paul R. Brook
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 151
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 99
  • Philosophy 40
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 64
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 25
Replace M. Bruscoli with:
M. Bruscoli Italy
Robert Miceli United States
Chunyan Wang China
S. Khanna India
Evan Harris Walker United States
Brian Cooper Australia
Joo-Cheol Shim South Korea
Casper Hesp Netherlands
Christian Stephan‐Otto Spain
M. R. S. Hawkins United Kingdom
Paul R. Brook relative to M. Bruscoli Italy M. Bruscoli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
M. Bruscoli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul R. Brook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul R. Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul R. Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul R. Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul R. Brook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul R. Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul R. Brook. The network helps show where Paul R. Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul R. Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul R. Brook Line = papers co-authored together Paul R. Brook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20251
3 20235
4 20211
5
The NANOGrav 11 yr Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Wave Memory
202030
6
The NANOGrav 11 yr Data Set: Limits on Gravitational Waves from Individual Supermassive Black Hole Binaries
201931
7
The Virtues of Time and Cadence for Pulsars and Fast Transients
20191
8 20196
9 201717
10 201537
11
Young Pulsar Timing and the Fermi Mission
20141
12 20093
13 200935
14 20071
15 20022
16 198567
17 198482
18 19808
19 19791
20
[Postgraduate training in psychiatry: the british scene (author's transl)].
19782

About Paul R. Brook

Paul R. Brook is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 346 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (9 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers) and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (151 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (99 citations) and Philosophy (40 citations). Paul R. Brook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include G. E. Berrios, P. T. Baker, K.K. Aggarwal, Zaven Arzoumanian, Adam Brazier, S. Johnston, Jeremy Gauntlett‐Gilbert, A. Karastergiou, R. M. Shannon and M. Kerr. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026