Emily Petroff

4.9k total citations
22 papers, 356 citations indexed

About

Emily Petroff is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Petroff has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 356 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 2 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in Emily Petroff's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (18 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers). Emily Petroff is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (18 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (13 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (7 papers). Emily Petroff collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Emily Petroff's co-authors include E. F. Keane, S. Johnston, W. van Straten, E D Barr, A. Jameson, R. M. Shannon, M. J. Keith, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Andrea Possenti and N. D. R. Bhat and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Emily Petroff

20 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Petroff Australia 8 350 68 22 22 16 22 356
Franz Kirsten Sweden 10 246 0.7× 79 1.2× 17 0.8× 18 0.8× 12 0.8× 17 260
Jumei Yao China 8 195 0.6× 56 0.8× 17 0.8× 17 0.8× 14 0.9× 19 213
Abhimanyu Susobhanan India 7 191 0.5× 60 0.9× 29 1.3× 8 0.4× 20 1.3× 12 196
Kenzie Nimmo Netherlands 11 278 0.8× 66 1.0× 10 0.5× 25 1.1× 15 0.9× 18 293
Jinchen Jiang China 8 180 0.5× 33 0.5× 11 0.5× 12 0.5× 9 0.6× 18 194
B. Marcote Netherlands 13 322 0.9× 118 1.7× 14 0.6× 11 0.5× 10 0.6× 34 336
K. Gourdji Australia 8 267 0.8× 62 0.9× 8 0.4× 15 0.7× 8 0.5× 22 277
D. Vetrugno Italy 9 165 0.5× 54 0.8× 23 1.0× 8 0.4× 20 1.3× 21 184
K. J. Lee Germany 10 264 0.8× 82 1.2× 51 2.3× 29 1.3× 41 2.6× 11 272
M. P. Snelders United States 7 159 0.5× 41 0.6× 6 0.3× 17 0.8× 13 0.8× 10 171

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Petroff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Petroff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Petroff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Petroff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Petroff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Petroff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Petroff. The network helps show where Emily Petroff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Petroff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Petroff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Petroff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Petroff. Emily Petroff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pandhi, Ayush, B. M. Gaensler, Ziggy Pleunis, et al.. (2025). Improved Constraints on the Faraday Rotation toward Eight Fast Radio Bursts Using Dense Grids of Polarized Radio Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. 982(2). 146–146.
2.
Zwaniga, A. V., Charanjot Brar, V. M. Kaspi, et al.. (2024). frb-voe: A Real-time Virtual Observatory Event Alert Service for Fast Radio Bursts. The Astronomical Journal. 169(1). 39–39. 2 indexed citations
3.
Leeuwen, J. van, A. V. Bilous, Liam Connor, et al.. (2024). Comprehensive analysis of the Apertif fast radio burst sample. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 693. A279–A279. 3 indexed citations
4.
Rafiei-Ravandi, Masoud, Kendrick M. Smith, Daniele Michilli, et al.. (2024). Statistical Association between the Candidate Repeating FRB 20200320A and a Galaxy Group. The Astrophysical Journal. 961(2). 177–177. 1 indexed citations
5.
Pol, Nihan S., Sarah Burke-Spolaor, N. Hurley‐Walker, et al.. (2021). The Location of Young Pulsar PSR J0837–2454: Galactic Halo or Local Supernova Remnant?. The Astrophysical Journal. 911(2). 121–121. 4 indexed citations
6.
Gardenier, D. W., Liam Connor, J. van Leeuwen, L. C. Oostrum, & Emily Petroff. (2021). Synthesising the repeating FRB population using frbpoppy. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 647. A30–A30. 18 indexed citations
7.
Bhardwaj, Mohit, A. Yu. Kirichenko, Daniele Michilli, et al.. (2021). A Local Universe Host for the Repeating Fast Radio Burst FRB 20181030A. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 919(2). L24–L24. 58 indexed citations
8.
Petroff, Emily & O. Yaron. (2020). Fast Radio Burst Catalogue on the TNS. 160. 1. 1 indexed citations
9.
Caleb, Manisha, W. van Straten, E. F. Keane, et al.. (2019). Polarization studies of rotating radio transients. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 487(1). 1191–1199. 7 indexed citations
10.
Marcote, B., Kenzie Nimmo, O. S. Salafia, et al.. (2019). Resolving the Decades-long Transient FIRST J141918.9+394036: An Orphan Long Gamma-Ray Burst or a Young Magnetar Nebula?. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 876(1). L14–L14. 12 indexed citations
11.
Caleb, Manisha, E. F. Keane, W. van Straten, et al.. (2018). The SUrvey for Pulsars and Extragalactic Radio Bursts – III. Polarization properties of FRBs 160102 and 151230. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 478(2). 2046–2055. 29 indexed citations
12.
Landecker, T. L., R. Kothes, B. M. Gaensler, et al.. (2017). Polarization Gradient Study of Interstellar Medium Turbulence Using the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. The Astrophysical Journal. 835(2). 210–210. 2 indexed citations
13.
Petroff, Emily. (2017). Fast radio bursts: recent discoveries and future prospects. 10–10. 2 indexed citations
14.
Schüßler, F., F. Brun, G. Pühlhofer, et al.. (2017). Limits on the TeV gamma-ray afterglow of fast radio bursts with H.E.S.S.. AIP conference proceedings. 1792. 60013–60013.
15.
Johnston, S., E. F. Keane, Shivani Bhandari, et al.. (2016). Radio light curve of the galaxy possibly associated with FRB 150418. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 465(2). 2143–2150. 7 indexed citations
16.
Keane, E. F. & Emily Petroff. (2015). Fast radio bursts: search sensitivities and completeness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 447(3). 2852–2856. 87 indexed citations
17.
Petroff, Emily, E. F. Keane, E D Barr, et al.. (2015). Identifying the source of perytons at the Parkes radio telescope. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 451(4). 3933–3940. 48 indexed citations
18.
Kerr, M., Andrea Possenti, R. N. Manchester, et al.. (2014). Young Pulsar Timing and the Fermi Mission. 574. 1 indexed citations
19.
Petroff, Emily, M. J. Keith, S. Johnston, W. van Straten, & R. M. Shannon. (2013). Dispersion measure variations in a sample of 168 pulsars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 435(2). 1610–1617. 35 indexed citations
20.
Petroff, Emily, S. Johnston, M. Krämer, et al.. (2011). Transient Radio Neutron Stars. 786. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026