Paul Preston
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 2%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Rheumatology top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Mark A. RosenSamuel C. HughesErrol LoboR. H. LowndesC. T. M. SpeakmanD. N. SamarasekeraOliver WisemanJ Clarke
- Topics
- Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers)Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Preston
43 papers receiving 628 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Surgery 395
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 173
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 133
- Rheumatology 103
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 101
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Preston
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Preston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Preston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Preston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Preston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Preston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Preston. The network helps show where Paul Preston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Preston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Preston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Preston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Preston. Paul Preston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 88 | |
| 6 | Patient Safety in Labor and Delivery: A Team Approach to High Reliability | 2 |
| 7 | An awareness of guilt | 2 |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 235 | |
| 10 | Management strategies for encouraging creativity. | 1 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Paul Preston
Paul Preston is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Developmental Neuroscience and Transplantation, having authored 47 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (5 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (173 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (80 citations) and Surgery (395 citations). Paul Preston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Rosen, Samuel C. Hughes, Errol Lobo, R. H. Lowndes, C. T. M. Speakman, D. N. Samarasekera, Oliver Wiseman, J Clarke, Gerald Fraser and Beth Glosten. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.