Helen Richmond

1.9k total citations
27 papers, 892 citations indexed

About

Helen Richmond is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Richmond has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 892 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Pharmacology, 7 papers in General Health Professions and 5 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Helen Richmond's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Helen Richmond is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (6 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). Helen Richmond collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Ireland. Helen Richmond's co-authors include Amanda Häll, Sarah E Lamb, Bethan Copsey, Randall P. Morton, Malcolm M. Hargraves, Esther Williamson, Zara Hansen, Zafra Cooper, David Davies and Beth Fordham and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Blood and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Helen Richmond

26 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Helen Richmond United Kingdom 13 368 163 139 130 124 27 892
Anna Jöud Sweden 18 275 0.7× 94 0.6× 135 1.0× 91 0.7× 200 1.6× 64 921
Adriaan van’t Spijker Netherlands 13 139 0.4× 130 0.8× 179 1.3× 87 0.7× 132 1.1× 18 1.1k
G. Stucki Germany 18 178 0.5× 103 0.6× 371 2.7× 85 0.7× 273 2.2× 49 1.2k
Dana J. Lawrence United States 15 304 0.8× 152 0.9× 71 0.5× 159 1.2× 29 0.2× 72 890
Anava Wren United States 18 164 0.4× 126 0.8× 115 0.8× 124 1.0× 29 0.2× 37 1.1k
Mathilda Björk Sweden 19 241 0.7× 209 1.3× 219 1.6× 46 0.4× 473 3.8× 80 998
Neesha Harnam United States 11 127 0.3× 59 0.4× 95 0.7× 50 0.4× 94 0.8× 16 776
L. Humphrey United Kingdom 11 193 0.5× 67 0.4× 235 1.7× 61 0.5× 126 1.0× 28 664
Berit Schiøttz‐Christensen Denmark 20 588 1.6× 99 0.6× 176 1.3× 130 1.0× 517 4.2× 99 1.5k
J. Denise Power Canada 17 425 1.2× 165 1.0× 248 1.8× 95 0.7× 512 4.1× 47 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Richmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Richmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Richmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Richmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Richmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Richmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Richmond. The network helps show where Helen Richmond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Richmond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Richmond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Richmond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Richmond. Helen Richmond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Häll, Amanda, et al.. (2021). Champions for improved adherence to guidelines in long-term care homes: a systematic review. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(1). 85–85. 12 indexed citations
2.
Häll, Amanda, et al.. (2021). Changing Health-Related Behaviors 3: Lessons from Implementation Science. Methods in molecular biology. 2249. 571–595. 1 indexed citations
3.
Häll, Amanda, et al.. (2021). What do the general public believe about the causes, prognosis and best management strategies for low back pain? A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 682–682. 25 indexed citations
4.
Häll, Amanda, Helen Richmond, Andrea Pike, et al.. (2021). What behaviour change techniques have been used to improve adherence to evidence-based low back pain imaging?. Implementation Science. 16(1). 68–68. 7 indexed citations
5.
Rees, Sophie, Bruno Mazuquin, Helen Richmond, Esther Williamson, & Julie Bruce. (2021). Role of physiotherapy in supporting recovery from breast cancer treatment: a qualitative study embedded within the UK PROSPER trial. BMJ Open. 11(5). e040116–e040116. 7 indexed citations
6.
Sugavanam, Thavapriya, Esther Williamson, Beth Fordham, et al.. (2020). Evaluation of the implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme using online training: a cohort implementation study. Physiotherapy. 109. 4–12. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hurley, Deirdre A., Alison Keogh, Amanda Häll, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of an E-Learning Training Program to Support Implementation of a Group-Based, Theory-Driven, Self-Management Intervention For Osteoarthritis and Low-Back Pain: Pre-Post Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(3). e11123–e11123. 29 indexed citations
9.
10.
Richmond, Helen, Cynthia Srikesavan, Esther Williamson, et al.. (2018). Development of an exercise intervention for the prevention of musculoskeletal shoulder problems after breast cancer treatment: the prevention of shoulder problems trial (UK PROSPER). BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 463–463. 24 indexed citations
11.
Richmond, Helen, Bethan Copsey, Amanda Häll, David Davies, & Sarah E Lamb. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions. BMC Medical Education. 17(1). 227–227. 79 indexed citations
12.
Richmond, Helen, Amanda Häll, Zara Hansen, et al.. (2017). Exploring physiotherapists' experiences of implementing a cognitive behavioural approach for managing low back pain and identifying barriers to long-term implementation. Physiotherapy. 104(1). 107–115. 29 indexed citations
13.
Richmond, Helen. (2016). Using a CBT approach to manage low back pain.. Nursing times. 112(18). 12–4. 3 indexed citations
14.
Richmond, Helen, Amanda Häll, Zara Hansen, et al.. (2016). Using mixed methods evaluation to assess the feasibility of online clinical training in evidence based interventions: a case study of cognitive behavioural treatment for low back pain. BMC Medical Education. 16(1). 163–163. 16 indexed citations
15.
Häll, Amanda, Helen Richmond, Bethan Copsey, et al.. (2016). Physiotherapist-delivered cognitive-behavioural interventions are effective for low back pain, but can they be replicated in clinical practice? A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 40(1). 1–9. 128 indexed citations
16.
Richmond, Helen, Amanda Häll, Bethan Copsey, et al.. (2015). The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Treatment for Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 10(8). e0134192–e0134192. 145 indexed citations
17.
Richmond, Helen. (2006). Mentoring in midwifery.. PubMed. 9(11). 434–7. 4 indexed citations
18.
Richmond, Helen. (2003). Women's experience of waterbirth.. PubMed. 6(3). 26–31. 24 indexed citations
19.
Richmond, Helen. (2003). Theories surrounding waterbirth.. PubMed. 6(2). 10–3. 6 indexed citations
20.
Kyle, Robert A., et al.. (1966). Bone Marrow Aspiration in the Antemortem Diagnosis of Primary Systemic Amyloidosis. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 45(3). 252–257. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026