Samuel C. Hughes
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 6
- Anesthesia and Sedative Agents 6
- Developmental Neuroscience top 2%
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research 11
-
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques 13
- Neonatal and fetal brain pathology 6
- Surgery top 5%
- Anesthesia and Pain Management 23
- Nausea and vomiting management 5
-
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes 5
Samuel C. Hughes
58 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 401
- Developmental Neuroscience 180
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 145
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 336
- Surgery 630
Countries citing papers authored by Samuel C. Hughes
This map shows the geographic impact of Samuel C. Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samuel C. Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samuel C. Hughes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Samuel C. Hughes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samuel C. Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samuel C. Hughes. The network helps show where Samuel C. Hughes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Samuel C. Hughes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 62 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 3 | Neuraxial Blockade in Obstetrics and Complications Related to Infection: Can We Lower the Risk? | 2007 | 2 |
| 4 | Traditional I.V. Catheters: To Be or Not to Be, That Is the Question! | 2005 | 1 |
| 5 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2004 | 9 | |
| 7 | Shnider and Levinson's anesthesia for obstetrics | 2002 | 36 |
| 8 | 1998 | 235 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1995 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1995 | 51 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 26 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 65 | |
| 20 | 1982 | 5 |
About Samuel C. Hughes
Samuel C. Hughes is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (23 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (13 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (11 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (6 papers), Neonatal and fetal brain pathology (6 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (6 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (5 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (401 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (180 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (145 citations). Samuel C. Hughes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and India. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Rosen, Sol M. Shnider, Gershon Levinson, Paul Preston, Stephen J. Stefani, Errol Lobo, P. A. Dailey, Claudine Amiel‐Tison, G Barrier and T. K. Abboud. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesiology, Journal of Experimental Biology and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.