Paul M. Neves
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Materials Chemistry
- Geophysics
- Co-authors
- Nicholas P. ButchSheng RanShanta SahaJohnpierre PaglioneI-Lin LiuYun Suk EoWesley FuhrmanChris Eckberg
- Topics
- Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers)Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers)Iron-based superconductors research (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandItaly
In The Last Decade
Paul M. Neves
9 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Condensed Matter Physics 240
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 161
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 119
- Materials Chemistry 43
- Geophysics 38
Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Neves
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Neves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Neves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Neves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Neves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Neves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Neves. The network helps show where Paul M. Neves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Neves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Neves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Neves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Neves. Paul M. Neves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 174 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Generalized Emulation Services for Mach 3.0 Overview, Experiences and Current Status | 13 |
About Paul M. Neves
Paul M. Neves is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 323 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (4 papers) and Iron-based superconductors research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (240 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (161 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (119 citations). Paul M. Neves has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas P. Butch, Sheng Ran, Shanta Saha, Johnpierre Paglione, I-Lin Liu, Yun Suk Eo, Wesley Fuhrman, Chris Eckberg, Hyunsoo Kim and John Singleton. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Nature Physics and Journal of Applied Crystallography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.