J. G. Checkelsky
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 0.2%
- Materials Chemistry top 0.5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 1%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Topics
- Topological Materials and Phenomena (39 papers)Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (24 papers)Graphene research and applications (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanGermany
In The Last Decade
J. G. Checkelsky
66 papers receiving 8.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 6.5k
- Materials Chemistry 5.1k
- Condensed Matter Physics 3.9k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.9k
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 549
Countries citing papers authored by J. G. Checkelsky
This map shows the geographic impact of J. G. Checkelsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. G. Checkelsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. G. Checkelsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. G. Checkelsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. G. Checkelsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. G. Checkelsky. The network helps show where J. G. Checkelsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. G. Checkelsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. G. Checkelsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. G. Checkelsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. G. Checkelsky. J. G. Checkelsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 22 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Evidence for clean 2D superconductivity and field-induced finite-momentum pairing in a bulk vdW superlattice | 1 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 142 | |
| 16 | 95 | |
| 17 | Superconductivity in | 824 |
| 18 | A tunable topological insulator in the spin helical Dirac transport regimebreakdown → | 1503 |
| 19 | 201 | |
| 20 | Anisotropic Magnetoresistance of Fe_xCo_1-xS_2 | 1 |
About J. G. Checkelsky
J. G. Checkelsky is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 71 papers that have together received 8.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topological Materials and Phenomena (39 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (24 papers) and Graphene research and applications (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (3.9k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (6.5k citations) and Materials Chemistry (5.1k citations). J. G. Checkelsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include N. P. Ong, R. J. Cava, Y. S. Hor, M. Zahid Hasan, Ali Yazdani, P. Roushan, Yoshinori Tokura, Lü Li, Dongxia Qu and T. Suzuki. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.