Journal of Applied Crystallography

8.6k papers and 548.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.6k papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography in the last decades have received a total of 548.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography usually cover Materials Chemistry (5.7k papers), Radiation (2.1k papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (949 papers) specifically the topics of X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography (3.0k papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (1.0k papers) and Enzyme Structure and Function (990 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Crystallography are Louis J. Farrugia, H. M. Rietveld, P. Kraulis, Anthony L. Spek, Fujio Izumi, Koichi Momma, Brian H. Toby, Dmitri I. Svergun, D. S. Moss and Janet M. Thornton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Crystallography

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Crystallography. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Crystallography with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Crystallography more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025