Paul Henle

698 citations
16 papers · 252 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 1
    • Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
    • Byzantine Studies and History 1

Paul Henle

13 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

Paul Henle
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Theoretical Computer Science 11
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 129
  • History and Philosophy of Science 44
  • Philosophy 71
  • Language and Linguistics 43
Replace James S. Albertson with:
James S. Albertson
Leonard Linsky United States
Fred Sommers United States
Richard Sharvy United States
V. H. Dudman Australia
H. Putnam United States
Guido Küng Switzerland
G. B. KEENE China
Gareth Lloyd Evans United Kingdom
C. Anthony Anderson United States
Paul Henle relative to James S. Albertson James S. Albertson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
James S. Albertson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Henle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Henle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Henle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Henle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Henle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Henle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Henle. The network helps show where Paul Henle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Paul Henle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Henle Line = papers co-authored together Paul Henle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation
195292
2 195947
3 195234
4 196419
5 195118
6 195213
7 195911
8 19526
9 19616
10 19612
11
Sprache, Denken, Kultur
19691
12 19571
13 19511
14
THE PROBLEM OF FUTURE CONTINGENCIES
20161
15 19530
16 19510

About Paul Henle

Paul Henle is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics, Language and Linguistics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Linguistic Education and Pedagogy (1 paper), Linguistic research and analysis (1 paper) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (11 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (129 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (44 citations), Philosophy (71 citations) and Language and Linguistics (43 citations). Frequent co-authors include Susanne K. Langer, Horace Μ. Κallen, Henry W. Johnstone, Alonzo Church, Max Black, Charles A. Baylis, Avrum Stroll, Henry B. Veatch, Mikel Dufrenne and Philip P. Hallie. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, The Journal of Philosophy and Journal of Symbolic Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact