Paul H. Goodwin
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Cell Biology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Tom HsiangSeanna L. AnnisErnesto Guzmán‐NovoaMollah Md. HamiduzzamanNuria MorfínGeorge MahukuM.H.A.J. JoostenYangdou Wei
- Topics
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (74 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (53 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (42 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLoS ONEApplied and Environmental Microbiology
- Partner nations
- CanadaChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Paul H. Goodwin
175 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Plant Science 2.9k
- Cell Biology 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Insect Science 882
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 675
Countries citing papers authored by Paul H. Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul H. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul H. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul H. Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul H. Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul H. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul H. Goodwin. The network helps show where Paul H. Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul H. Goodwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul H. Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul H. Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul H. Goodwin. Paul H. Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 92 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | New clues in understanding Pierce's disease | 4 |
About Paul H. Goodwin
Paul H. Goodwin is a scholar working on Horticulture, Plant Science and Cell Biology, having authored 180 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (74 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (53 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (42 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (108 citations), Plant Science (2.9k citations) and Insect Science (882 citations). Paul H. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Hsiang, Seanna L. Annis, Ernesto Guzmán‐Novoa, Mollah Md. Hamiduzzaman, Nuria Morfín, George Mahuku, M.H.A.J. Joosten, Yangdou Wei, P.J.G.M. de Wit and Richard Laugé. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.