Richard Laugé
- Plant Science top 2%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- P.J.G.M. de WitM.H.A.J. JoostenThierry LanginPaul H. GoodwinClaire Veneault‐FourreyP. LindhoutJ. P. W. HaanstraH.W.J. van den Broek
- Topics
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (14 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesApplied and Environmental MicrobiologyGenetics
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard Laugé
18 papers receiving 854 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Plant Science 818
- Cell Biology 330
- Molecular Biology 244
- Biotechnology 39
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 29
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Laugé
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Laugé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Laugé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Laugé more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Laugé
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Laugé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Laugé. The network helps show where Richard Laugé may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Laugé
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Laugé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Laugé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Laugé. Richard Laugé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 98 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 79 | |
| 7 | 50 | |
| 8 | 92 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 91 | |
| 18 | Structure-function relation studies on AVR9 and AVR4 elicitors of Cladosporium fulvum. | 2 |
About Richard Laugé
Richard Laugé is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 884 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (14 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (9 papers) and Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (818 citations), Cell Biology (330 citations) and Biotechnology (39 citations). Richard Laugé has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include P.J.G.M. de Wit, M.H.A.J. Joosten, Thierry Langin, Paul H. Goodwin, Claire Veneault‐Fourrey, P. Lindhout, J. P. W. Haanstra, H.W.J. van den Broek, Guido Van den Ackerveken and Denise Parisot. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.