Paul Gerber

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
66 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Paul Gerber is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Gerber has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Paul Gerber's work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (13 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (10 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (9 papers). Paul Gerber is often cited by papers focused on Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (13 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (10 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (9 papers). Paul Gerber collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United Kingdom. Paul Gerber's co-authors include Melanie Volkamer, Nina Gerber, Karen Renaud, Verena Zimmermann, Karola Marky, Florian Kirchbuchner, Roy G. Beran, Oksana Kulyk, Joachim Vogt and Uwe Klingauf and has published in prestigious journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, Protein Engineering Design and Selection and Journal of Intellectual Capital.

In The Last Decade

Paul Gerber

60 papers receiving 553 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude and behavior

2018 296 citations Nina Gerber, Paul Gerber et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Paul Gerber Australia	9	346	100	98	79	73	66	592
Luke Miratrix United States	16	155 0.4×	39 0.4×	46 0.5×	91 1.2×	68 0.9×	62	1.2k
Michael Workman United States	13	277 0.8×	169 1.7×	93 0.9×	70 0.9×	22 0.3×	32	764
Carl D. Westine United States	10	104 0.3×	112 1.1×	79 0.8×	73 0.9×	69 0.9×	27	978
María Pampaka United Kingdom	16	159 0.5×	42 0.4×	31 0.3×	63 0.8×	48 0.7×	67	960
Cherng‐Jyh Yen United States	15	157 0.5×	117 1.2×	52 0.5×	78 1.0×	63 0.9×	31	902
Craig Locatis United States	15	118 0.3×	127 1.3×	48 0.5×	42 0.5×	60 0.8×	59	821
Philip Calvert New Zealand	15	170 0.5×	214 2.1×	182 1.9×	30 0.4×	19 0.3×	82	754
Diane Rasmussen Pennington United States	16	174 0.5×	141 1.4×	46 0.5×	82 1.0×	50 0.7×	68	710
Andraž Petrovčič Slovenia	15	308 0.9×	35 0.3×	107 1.1×	25 0.3×	30 0.4×	48	684
Young Eun Lee South Korea	12	275 0.8×	82 0.8×	280 2.9×	37 0.5×	38 0.5×	34	646

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Gerber

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Gerber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Gerber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Gerber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Gerber

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Gerber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Gerber. The network helps show where Paul Gerber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Gerber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Gerber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Gerber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Gerber. Paul Gerber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Marky, Karola, Sarah Prange, Paul Gerber, et al.. (2024). Decide Yourself or Delegate - User Preferences Regarding the Autonomy of Personal Privacy Assistants in Private IoT-Equipped Environments. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt). 1–20. 3 indexed citations

2.

Gerber, Paul, et al.. (2021). Taking on driving tasks yourself? That was yesterday! How drivers would like to be supported by assistance systems. TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt). 71–76. 1 indexed citations

3.

Kulyk, Oksana, et al.. (2019). Does This App Respect My Privacy? Design and Evaluation of Information Materials Supporting Privacy-Related Decisions of Smartphone Users. Repository KITopen (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations

4.

Gerber, Nina, et al.. (2018). FoxIT. 53–63. 14 indexed citations

5.

Gerber, Paul, et al.. (2014). How Glider Pilots Misread the FLARM Collision Alerting Display. 4(2). 86–97. 5 indexed citations

6.

Gerber, Paul, et al.. (2013). Interdisciplinarity is a key to enhance the product development process - how students deal with it and how they evolve with it. 593–598. 1 indexed citations

7.

Beran, Roy G., et al.. (2009). Usefulness of Austroads’ fitness‐to‐drive guidelines: lessons from the Gillett case. The Medical Journal of Australia. 190(9). 503–505. 8 indexed citations

8.

Gerber, Paul. (2007). Late‐term abortion: what can be learned from Royal Womenˈs Hospital v Medical Practitioners Board of Victoria?. The Medical Journal of Australia. 186(7). 359–362. 5 indexed citations

9.

Gerber, Paul. (2006). What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs?. The Medical Journal of Australia. 184(12). 632–635. 14 indexed citations

10.

Gerber, Paul. (1999). Confidentiality and the courts. The Medical Journal of Australia. 170(5). 222–224. 3 indexed citations

11.

Gerber, Paul. (1996). Is a general practitioner legally bound to render assistance to a stranger?. The Medical Journal of Australia. 165(3). 159–161. 2 indexed citations

12.

Gerber, Paul. (1992). Overseas medical practitioners and “racial discrimination”. The Medical Journal of Australia. 156(2). 138–138. 1 indexed citations

13.

Gerber, Paul. (1990). New regulations on sterilization. The Medical Journal of Australia. 152(12). 676–676. 2 indexed citations

14.

Gerber, Paul & Malcolm Coppleson. (1989). Clinical research after Auckland. The Medical Journal of Australia. 150(5). 230–233. 1 indexed citations

15.

Gerber, Paul. (1986). Should the baby live? The problem of handicapped infants. The Medical Journal of Australia. 144(9). 493–496. 35 indexed citations

16.

Gerber, Paul. (1986). Medical negligence and legal causation— where the twain do not meet. The Medical Journal of Australia. 144(11). 582–583. 2 indexed citations

17.

Wilson, Peter W.F. & Paul Gerber. (1985). Informed consent. The Medical Journal of Australia. 142(13). 704–705.

18.

Gerber, Paul. (1984). “Medical assault” doctrine. The Medical Journal of Australia. 140(12). 698–699. 4 indexed citations

19.

Gerber, Paul. (1983). Whitehouse v. Jordan A forceps delivery by advocates. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1(7). 326–328. 3 indexed citations

20.

Gerber, Paul. (1981). Medical confidentiality — a battered baby. The Medical Journal of Australia. 2(10). 542–544. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact