Paul Foster
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 12
- Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies 6
- Hepatology top 5%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 26
- Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies 6
- Pharmacology top 10%
-
- Historical and Linguistic Studies 17
-
- Archaeology and Historical Studies 6
-
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment 5
-
- Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research 5
- Co-authors
- Robert M. StroudKoho IizukaJohn D. PowderlyRoel FunkeJanet Finer-MooreDaniel V. SantiRajesh S. GokhaleJulian C.‐H. Chen
- Cited by
- OncologyHepatologyReligious studies
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (8 papers)Gastroenterology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Foster
60 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Oncology 832
- Hepatology 122
- Religious studies 50
- Pharmacology 171
- Immunology 208
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Foster. The network helps show where Paul Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Foster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 109 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | Potentiating the antitumor effects of chemotherapy with the selective PI3K inhibitor XL147 | 2007 | 12 |
| 12 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 38 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 179 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 76 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 50 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 2 | |
| 20 | White to move? : a portrait of East Africa today | 1961 | 1 |
About Paul Foster
Paul Foster is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Oncology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (26 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (17 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (12 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (6 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (5 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (832 citations), Hepatology (122 citations) and Religious studies (50 citations). Paul Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert M. Stroud, Koho Iizuka, John D. Powderly, Roel Funke, Janet Finer-Moore, Daniel V. Santi, Rajesh S. Gokhale, Julian C.‐H. Chen, David E. Cane and Larry J. W. Miercke. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.