Paul Chadwick
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Occupational Therapy top 0.5%
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Bob YoungT. EvansMark Sutton‐SmithGerry RaymanWilliam JeffcoateGeorge ToddMarion KerrEmma Barron
- Topics
- Wound Healing and Treatments (25 papers)Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (24 papers)Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Chadwick
31 papers receiving 639 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 450
- Rehabilitation 417
- Occupational Therapy 296
- Surgery 159
- Epidemiology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Chadwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Chadwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Chadwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Chadwick. The network helps show where Paul Chadwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Chadwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Chadwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Chadwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Chadwick. Paul Chadwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 83 | |
| 9 | The cost of diabetic foot ulcers and amputations to the National Health Service in Englandbreakdown → | 271 |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | Addressing local wound infection with a silver-containing, soft-silicones foam dressing: A case series | 1 |
| 15 | Consensus guidance for the use of debridement techniques in the UK | 27 |
| 16 | An action plan for the inpatient management of diabetic foot disease in line with 'Feet First' | 1 |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Paul Chadwick
Paul Chadwick is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 33 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (25 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (24 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (296 citations), Rehabilitation (417 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (450 citations). Paul Chadwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bob Young, T. Evans, Mark Sutton‐Smith, Gerry Rayman, William Jeffcoate, George Todd, Marion Kerr, Emma Barron, W. M. Kong and Karen Ousey. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetologia, BMJ Open and Diabetic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.