Duncan Stang
Impact in
- Occupational Therapy top 1%
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
- Rehabilitation top 2%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management 11
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 10
- Co-authors
- Graham Leese (8 shared papers)Matthew J. Young (4 shared papers)Brian Kennon (3 shared papers)Andrew Seaton (2 shared papers)D. Pearson (1 shared paper)John McKnight (1 shared paper)Donald Pearson (1 shared paper)Robert S. Lindsay (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Wound Care (2 papers)Diabetes Care (1 paper)Diabetic Medicine (1 paper)Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews (1 paper)International Journal of Clinical Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Duncan Stang
13 papers receiving 300 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Occupational Therapy 139
- Rehabilitation 195
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 238
- Drug Discovery 2
- Dermatology 17
Countries citing papers authored by Duncan Stang
This map shows the geographic impact of Duncan Stang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Duncan Stang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duncan Stang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Duncan Stang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Duncan Stang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Duncan Stang. The network helps show where Duncan Stang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Duncan Stang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 81 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 3 | Consensus guidance for the use of debridement techniques in the UK | 2011 | 27 |
| 4 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 20 | |
| 7 | Use of antibiotics in people with diabetic foot disease: A consensus statement | 2009 | 17 |
| 8 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 11 | Podiatry competency framework for integrated diabetic foot care: a user's guide | 2012 | 6 |
| 12 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 2 |
About Duncan Stang
Duncan Stang is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rehabilitation, Occupational Therapy, Surgery and Epidemiology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (11 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (10 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (8 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (2 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper), Streptococcal Infections and Treatments (1 paper) and Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (139 citations), Rehabilitation (195 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (238 citations), Drug Discovery (2 citations) and Dermatology (17 citations). Duncan Stang has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Graham Leese, Matthew J. Young, Brian Kennon, Andrew Seaton, D. Pearson, John McKnight, Donald Pearson, Robert S. Lindsay, Claire McDougall and Stephanie J. Dancer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Wound Care, Diabetes Care, Diabetic Medicine, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews and International Journal of Clinical Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.