Paul Best
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 5
-
- Child Abuse and Trauma 5
- Co-authors
- Brian J. TaylorRoger ManktelowMark A. TullyCarolyn BlairAlan MaddockGavin DavidsonTracey McConnellRuth F. Hunter
- Journals
- Research Involvement and Engagement (3 papers)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (3 papers)Children and Youth Services Review (3 papers)International Journal of Social Research Methodology (1 paper)European Neuropsychopharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCambodiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul Best
57 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
- Applied Psychology 252
- Communication 192
- Clinical Psychology 388
- Human-Computer Interaction 92
- Sociology and Political Science 687
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Best
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Best's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Best with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Best more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Best
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Best. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Best. The network helps show where Paul Best may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Best, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 8 | Most workers want to continue working from home in the post-pandemic world, survey finds | 2021 | 1 |
| 9 | 2021 | 47 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2018 | 43 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 18 |
About Paul Best
Paul Best is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction, General Health Professions and Conservation, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (9 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (9 papers), Physical Activity and Health (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Community Health and Development (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (252 citations), Communication (192 citations), Clinical Psychology (388 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (92 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (687 citations). Paul Best has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Cambodia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Brian J. Taylor, Roger Manktelow, Mark A. Tully, Carolyn Blair, Alan Maddock, Gavin Davidson, Tracey McConnell, Ruth F. Hunter, Frank Kee and Tom Van Daele. Their work appears in journals such as Research Involvement and Engagement, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Children and Youth Services Review, International Journal of Social Research Methodology and European Neuropsychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.