Paul Alpers
Impact in
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism
- Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
- Literature: history, themes, analysis
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
- Classics 3
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1
-
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- German Literature and Culture Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Svetlana AlpersRobert E. ColemanStephen OrgelWilliam Randolph TaylorRichard PoirierWilliam H. PritchardPaul de ManGeoffrey Craig
- Journals
- Representations (4 papers)New Literary History (4 papers)ELH (4 papers)The Modern Language Review (1 paper)Essays in Criticism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Paul Alpers
22 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Literature and Literary Theory 134
- Classics 30
- History 52
- Music 15
- Geography, Planning and Development 25
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Alpers
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Alpers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Alpers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Alpers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Alpers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Alpers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Alpers. The network helps show where Paul Alpers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Paul Alpers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 5 | What is pastoral | 1996 | 83 |
| 6 | Schiller's Naive and Sentimental Poetry and the Modern Idea of Pastoral | 1990 | 2 |
| 7 | 1985 | 5 | |
| 8 | 1983 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1982 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1978 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1977 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1977 | 18 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 8 | |
| 14 | Edmund Spenser: a critical anthology | 1969 | 4 |
| 15 | 1968 | 32 | |
| 16 | 1968 | 2 | |
| 17 | Elizabethan poetry : modern essays in criticism | 1967 | 5 |
| 18 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 19 | In defense of reading : a reader's approach to literary criticism | 1962 | 9 |
| 20 | 1962 | 0 |
About Paul Alpers
Paul Alpers is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies, Anthropology and History, having authored 28 papers that have together received 289 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (2 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (2 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (2 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (2 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (134 citations), Classics (30 citations), History (52 citations), Music (15 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (25 citations). Paul Alpers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Svetlana Alpers, Robert E. Coleman, Stephen Orgel, William Randolph Taylor, Richard Poirier, William H. Pritchard, Paul de Man, Geoffrey Craig, Reuben A. Brower and Neil Hertz. Their work appears in journals such as Representations, New Literary History, ELH, The Modern Language Review and Essays in Criticism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.