Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A comparison of optimal and sub-optimal MAP decoding algorithms operating in the log domain
20021.1k citationsPatrick Robertson et al.profile →
Two-dimensional pilot-symbol-aided channel estimation by Wiener filtering
2002461 citationsPatrick Robertson et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Robertson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Robertson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Robertson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Robertson. The network helps show where Patrick Robertson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Robertson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Robertson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Robertson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Robertson. Patrick Robertson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Robertson, Patrick, et al.. (2011). Collaborative Pedestrian Mapping of Buildings Using Inertial Sensors and FootSLAM. elib (German Aerospace Center). 1366–1377.23 indexed citations
9.
Schubert, Frank, et al.. (2010). Modeling of multipath propagation components caused by trees and forests. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 1–5.13 indexed citations
10.
Robertson, Patrick, et al.. (2010). NWSS field survey and QA procedure.. 64(4). 10–14.2 indexed citations
11.
Frank, Korbinian, et al.. (2010). Reliable Real-Time Recognition of motion related human activities using MEMS inertial sensors. elib (German Aerospace Center).44 indexed citations
12.
Schubert, Frank, Patrick Robertson, Bernard H. Fleury, Alexander Steingaß, & Andreas Lehner. (2009). Modeling the GNSS Rural Radio Channel: Wave Propagation Effects caused by Trees and Alleys. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2372–2377.2 indexed citations
13.
Angermann, Michael, et al.. (2009). A Reference Measurement Data Set for Multisensor Pedestrian Navigation with Accurate Ground Truth. elib (German Aerospace Center). 12(1). 23–5.6 indexed citations
14.
Robertson, Patrick, Michael Angermann, Bernhard Krach, & Mohammed Khider. (2009). Inertial Systems Based Joint Mapping andPositioning for Pedestrian Navigation. elib (German Aerospace Center). 2096–2107.11 indexed citations
15.
Khider, Mohammed, et al.. (2009). MAPS AND FLOOR PLANS ENHANCED 3D MOVEMENT MODEL FOR PEDESTRIAN NAVIGATION. elib (German Aerospace Center). 790–802.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.