Patrick Redmond

29 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Patrick Redmond
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 265
  • Family Practice 84
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
  • Emergency Medical Services 84
  • Toxicology 16
Replace Todd Nesbit with:
Todd Nesbit United States
Andrew Stafford Australia
Reamer L. Bushardt United States
Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić Croatia
Erica Tong Australia
Claire Scullin United Kingdom
Anna Vögele Italy
A. Clara Drenth‐van Maanen Netherlands
Gülistan Bahat Türkiye
Trine Graabæk Denmark
Patrick Redmond relative to Todd Nesbit United States Todd Nesbit's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Todd Nesbit · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Redmond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Redmond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Redmond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Redmond. The network helps show where Patrick Redmond may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Patrick Redmond Line = papers co-authored together Patrick Redmond links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018110
2 2018101
3 202129
4 201624
5 201023
6 201622
7 202019
8 202016
9 202115
10 202012
11 200712
12 201511
13 200710
14 20199
15 20217
16 20216
17 20134
18
Open Globe Injuries and the Incidence of Sympathetic Ophthalmia at a Large County Hospital
20142
19 20222
20 20242

About Patrick Redmond

Patrick Redmond is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (6 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (265 citations), Family Practice (84 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations), Emergency Medical Services (84 citations) and Toxicology (16 citations). Patrick Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Fahey, Carmel Hughes, Tamasine Grimes, Ronan McDonnell, Frank Moriarty, Fiona Boland, Ronald McDowell, Teresa Pérez, Emma Wallace and Michael Naughton. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Age and Ageing, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and British Journal of General Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026