Patrick Gamez

423 total citations
12 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Patrick Gamez is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Patrick Gamez has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Safety Research and 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Patrick Gamez's work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Patrick Gamez is often cited by papers focused on Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (4 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (4 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers). Patrick Gamez collaborates with scholars based in United States. Patrick Gamez's co-authors include Daniel B. Shank, Christopher Graves and Sophia Rodriguez and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and AI & Society.

In The Last Decade

Patrick Gamez

10 papers receiving 227 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Patrick Gamez United States	5	88	87	81	81	65	12	246
Armin Granulo Germany	3	127 1.4×	73 0.8×	111 1.4×	77 1.0×	73 1.1×	7	292
Jungyong Ahn South Korea	5	148 1.7×	54 0.6×	105 1.3×	34 0.4×	79 1.2×	9	274
Jolie M. Martin United States	8	40 0.5×	52 0.6×	91 1.1×	32 0.4×	29 0.4×	19	227
Matthew D. Pickard United States	8	81 0.9×	21 0.2×	64 0.8×	21 0.3×	76 1.2×	11	258
Gain Park South Korea	10	171 1.9×	20 0.2×	92 1.1×	41 0.5×	128 2.0×	18	323
Carolin Ischen Netherlands	6	173 2.0×	28 0.3×	77 1.0×	12 0.1×	51 0.8×	11	251
Mehmet Okan Türkiye	8	172 2.0×	21 0.2×	109 1.3×	26 0.3×	109 1.7×	13	312
Kassandra Ross United States	2	218 2.5×	19 0.2×	160 2.0×	16 0.2×	91 1.4×	2	310
Mengying Zhang China	6	207 2.4×	18 0.2×	103 1.3×	15 0.2×	126 1.9×	16	299
Ben Green Australia	8	38 0.4×	59 0.7×	87 1.1×	14 0.2×	52 0.8×	19	210

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Gamez

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Gamez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Gamez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Gamez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Gamez

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Gamez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Gamez. The network helps show where Patrick Gamez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Gamez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Gamez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Gamez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Gamez. Patrick Gamez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Gamez, Patrick. (2023). The Early Foucault By StuartElden, Polity. 2021. 281 + xiv pp. $26.96 (paper). ISBN: 978‐1509525966. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 59(3). 352–354.

2.

Gamez, Patrick. (2023). Inhuman Hermeneutics of the Self: Biopolitics in the Age of Big Data. Foucault Studies. 80–110.

3.

Gamez, Patrick. (2022). A Friendly Critique of Levinasian Machine Ethics. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 60(1). 118–149. 2 indexed citations

4.

Shank, Daniel B., et al.. (2021). Can mind perception explain virtuous character judgments of artificial intelligence?. 2(3). 199–211. 15 indexed citations

5.

Shank, Daniel B., et al.. (2020). Supplemental Material for Can Mind Perception Explain Virtuous Character Judgments of Artificial Intelligence?. 1 indexed citations

6.

Gamez, Patrick, et al.. (2020). Artificial virtue: the machine question and perceptions of moral character in artificial moral agents. AI & Society. 35(4). 795–809. 46 indexed citations

7.

Shank, Daniel B., et al.. (2019). Feeling our way to machine minds: People's emotions when perceiving mind in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior. 98. 256–266. 160 indexed citations

8.

Gamez, Patrick. (2018). Did Foucault do Ethics? The "Ethical Turn," Neoliberalism, and the Problem of Truth. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 26(1). 107–133. 6 indexed citations

9.

Gamez, Patrick. (2018). Metaphysics or Metaphors for the Anthropocene? Scientific Naturalism and the Agency of Things. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(1). 191–212. 2 indexed citations

10.

Gamez, Patrick. (2018). The place of the Iranian Revolution in the history of truth: Foucault on neoliberalism, spirituality and enlightenment. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 45(1). 96–124. 3 indexed citations

11.

Gamez, Patrick. (2014). Ricoeur and Foucault: Between Ontology and Critique. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(2). 90–107. 1 indexed citations

12.

Gamez, Patrick, et al.. (2008). Walter Benjamin’s Archive. Symposium. 12(1). 193–195. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact