Gain Park

534 total citations
18 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Gain Park is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Gain Park has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Social Psychology, 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 6 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Gain Park's work include Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (12 papers), AI in Service Interactions (11 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Gain Park is often cited by papers focused on Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (12 papers), AI in Service Interactions (11 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). Gain Park collaborates with scholars based in South Korea and United States. Gain Park's co-authors include Seyoung Lee and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Gain Park

16 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gain Park South Korea	10	171	128	92	63	41	18	323
Megan French United States	5	119 0.7×	48 0.4×	183 2.0×	20 0.3×	30 0.7×	9	375
Nicky Terblanche South Africa	10	81 0.5×	76 0.6×	37 0.4×	100 1.6×	11 0.3×	36	315
Mehmet Okan Türkiye	8	172 1.0×	109 0.9×	109 1.2×	19 0.3×	26 0.6×	13	312
Sultan Almutairy Saudi Arabia	5	79 0.5×	14 0.1×	117 1.3×	13 0.2×	9 0.2×	7	365
Jeng‐Yi Tzeng Taiwan	8	42 0.2×	51 0.4×	109 1.2×	8 0.1×	11 0.3×	17	296
Rachel Saef United States	6	37 0.2×	56 0.4×	70 0.8×	23 0.4×	7 0.2×	8	224
Ahmet Göçen Türkiye	8	33 0.2×	28 0.2×	25 0.3×	10 0.2×	8 0.2×	39	280
Yu‐Shan Huang United States	9	167 1.0×	93 0.7×	194 2.1×	10 0.2×	26 0.6×	16	398
Akosua Tachie-Menson Ghana	7	117 0.7×	34 0.3×	64 0.7×	6 0.1×	10 0.2×	13	339
Paweł Niszczota Poland	8	44 0.3×	62 0.5×	56 0.6×	11 0.2×	81 2.0×	31	319

Countries citing papers authored by Gain Park

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gain Park's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gain Park with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gain Park more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gain Park

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gain Park. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gain Park. The network helps show where Gain Park may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gain Park

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gain Park. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gain Park based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gain Park. Gain Park is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Park, Gain, et al.. (2025). Dynamics of ChatGPT literacy: impact of trust, usefulness, self-efficacy, and user satisfaction. Current Psychology. 44(15). 13746–13755.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2024). Scope and limits of AI fundraisers: Moderated serial multiple mediation model between artificial emotions and willingness to donate via humanness and empathy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 201. 123211–123211. 9 indexed citations

Lee, Seyoung, et al.. (2024). Effect of AI counsellor’s nonverbal immediacy behaviour on user satisfaction: serial mediation of positive expectancy violation and rapport. Behaviour and Information Technology. 44(8). 1632–1648. 2 indexed citations

Park, Gain, et al.. (2024). Fundraising in Metaverse: Testing the Relationship Between Legitimization of Paltry Favors Effect, Self-Image Concern, Anthropomorphism, and Social Proof. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 41(15). 9320–9331.

Lee, Seyoung, et al.. (2024). Using AI chatbots in climate change mitigation: a moderated serial mediation model. Behaviour and Information Technology. 43(16). 4016–4032. 12 indexed citations

Park, Gain, et al.. (2024). Compliance-gaining in metaverse: A moderated parallel mediation model testing the interaction between legitimization of paltry favors technique and victim identification. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 203. 123349–123349. 4 indexed citations

Lee, Seyoung & Gain Park. (2024). Development and validation of ChatGPT literacy scale. Current Psychology. 43(21). 18992–19004. 34 indexed citations

Lee, Seyoung, et al.. (2023). Artificial emotions for charity collection: A serial mediation through perceived anthropomorphism and social presence. Telematics and Informatics. 82. 102009–102009. 20 indexed citations

Park, Gain, et al.. (2023). Human vs. machine-like representation in chatbot mental health counseling: the serial mediation of psychological distance and trust on compliance intention. Current Psychology. 43(5). 4352–4363. 35 indexed citations

10.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2023). Effect of Gratitude Expression of AI Chatbot on Willingness to Donate. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 40(20). 6647–6658. 11 indexed citations

11.

Lee, Seyoung, et al.. (2023). Legitimization of paltry favors effect and chatbot-moderated fundraising. Current Psychology. 43(10). 9245–9257. 5 indexed citations

12.

Lee, Seyoung & Gain Park. (2023). Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT Literacy on User Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of User Motivations. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 26(12). 913–918. 25 indexed citations

13.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2023). Do Anthropomorphic Chatbots Increase Counseling Satisfaction and Reuse Intention? The Moderated Mediation of Social Rapport and Social Anxiety. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 26(5). 357–365. 24 indexed citations

14.

Lee, Seyoung, et al.. (2022). Artificial Emotions for Charity Collection: A Serial Mediation Through Perceived Anthropomorphism and Social Presence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

15.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2022). Effect of AI chatbot emotional disclosure on user satisfaction and reuse intention for mental health counseling: a serial mediation model. Current Psychology. 42(32). 28663–28673. 53 indexed citations

16.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2022). Effect of AI chatbot empathy and identity disclosure on willingness to donate: the mediation of humanness and social presence. Behaviour and Information Technology. 42(12). 1998–2010. 64 indexed citations

17.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2020). Communicating Sustainability to Ethnocentric Consumers in China: Focusing on Social Distance from Foreign Corporations. Sustainability. 13(1). 47–47. 3 indexed citations

18.

Park, Gain, et al.. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility in Korea: How to Communicate Global Issues to Local Stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 23(2). 77–87. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact