Patrick Cheney
- Classics top 5%
-
- Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism 7
- Literature: history, themes, analysis 4
- Poetry Analysis and Criticism 3
- French Literature and Criticism 1
- History top 5%
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
- Anthropology top 10%
- Historical and Literary Studies 2
-
- Climate Change Policy and Economics 1
-
- Thoreau and American Literature 1
- Co-authors
- Frederick A. de ArmasAndrew HadfieldGarrett A. SullivanChristopher MarloweDavid SchleicherElizabeth HealeCharles MartindaleAnne Lake Prescott
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (3 papers)Milton Studies (2 papers)Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Patrick Cheney
24 papers receiving 93 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Classics 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 107
- History 55
- Anthropology 29
- Music 7
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Cheney
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Cheney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Cheney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Cheney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Cheney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Cheney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Cheney. The network helps show where Patrick Cheney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Patrick Cheney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 3 | English Authorship and the Early Modern Sublime: Spenser, Marlowe, Shakespeare, Jonson | 2018 | 2 |
| 4 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 5 | Close Reading: Introduction | 2015 | 6 |
| 6 | The Oxford history of classical reception in English literature | 2012 | 5 |
| 7 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 9 | Shakespeare studies: Introduction | 2008 | 4 |
| 10 | Early modern English drama : a critical companion | 2006 | 18 |
| 11 | 2004 | 24 | |
| 12 | Shakespeare, national poet-playwright | 2004 | 25 |
| 13 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 7 | |
| 18 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 9 |
About Patrick Cheney
Patrick Cheney is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics and Museology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (7 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), French Literature and Criticism (1 paper), Climate Change Policy and Economics (1 paper) and Thoreau and American Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (39 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (107 citations) and History (55 citations). Patrick Cheney has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Frederick A. de Armas, Andrew Hadfield, Garrett A. Sullivan, Christopher Marlowe, David Schleicher, Elizabeth Heale, Charles Martindale, Anne Lake Prescott, Norman Vance and Jennifer Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Milton Studies, Spenser Studies A Renaissance Poetry Annual, The Review of English Studies and Modern Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.