Pamela Perry
About
In The Last Decade
Pamela Perry
8 papers receiving 940 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 863
- Education 487
- Gender Studies 155
- Social Psychology 137
- Clinical Psychology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Pamela Perry
This map shows the geographic impact of Pamela Perry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pamela Perry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pamela Perry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pamela Perry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pamela Perry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pamela Perry. The network helps show where Pamela Perry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pamela Perry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pamela Perry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pamela Perry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pamela Perry. Pamela Perry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 158 | |
| 5 | 156 | |
| 6 | 151 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Off White: Readings on Race, Power, and Society breakdown → | 563 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.