Pam Squire
Impact in
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
- Physiology top 10%
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Papers in
-
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 3
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 3
- Co-authors
- Ian Gilron (1 shared paper)Ana Míriam Velly (1 shared paper)AJ Clark (1 shared paper)Andrea D Furlan (1 shared paper)Jennifer Stinson (1 shared paper)G. Allen Finley (1 shared paper)A. Gordon (1 shared paper)Sessle Bj (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pain Research and Management (1 paper)Journal of Pain (1 paper)Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Pam Squire
6 papers receiving 417 citations
Pam Squire's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 87
- Physiology 242
- Pharmacology 149
- Neurology 113
- Human-Computer Interaction 22
Countries citing papers authored by Pam Squire
This map shows the geographic impact of Pam Squire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pam Squire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pam Squire more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pam Squire
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pam Squire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pam Squire. The network helps show where Pam Squire may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pam Squire, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pharmacological Management of Chronic Neuropathic Pain: Revised Consensus Statement from the Canadian Pain Society Hit paper breakdown → | 2014 | 369 |
| 2 | 2011 | 24 | |
| 3 | Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients. | 2016 | 22 |
| 4 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 1 |
About Pam Squire
Pam Squire is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (1 paper), Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (1 paper) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (87 citations), Physiology (242 citations), Pharmacology (149 citations), Neurology (113 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations). Pam Squire has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ian Gilron, Ana Míriam Velly, AJ Clark, Andrea D Furlan, Jennifer Stinson, G. Allen Finley, A. Gordon, Sessle Bj, Paul Taenzer and Mark A. Ware. Their work appears in journals such as Pain Research and Management, Journal of Pain, Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, Cambridge University Press eBooks and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.