Michael R. Due

1.0k citations
27 papers · 647 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Michael R. Due

26 papers receiving 637 citations

Peers

Michael R. Due
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 265
  • Clinical Biochemistry 85
  • Equine 20
  • Physiology 223
  • Neurology 52
Replace Sharron Dolan with:
Sharron Dolan United Kingdom
Pishan Chang United Kingdom
Liisa Eränkö Finland
Francine Tramontina Brazil
Melissa Barker‐Haliski United States
Ittai Bushlin United States
David E. Naylor United States
Jo Sourbron Belgium
B. Djuričič Serbia
Joana M. Gaspar Brazil
Michael R. Due relative to Sharron Dolan United Kingdom Sharron Dolan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×17×
Sharron Dolan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael R. Due

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael R. Due's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael R. Due with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael R. Due more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael R. Due

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael R. Due. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael R. Due. The network helps show where Michael R. Due may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael R. Due, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael R. Due Line = papers co-authored together Michael R. Due links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201294
2 201290
3 201480
4 201357
5 201247
6 201036
7 200434
8 201633
9 200719
10
A new tool to monitor training and performance of sport horses using global positioning system (GPS) with integrated GSM capabilities.
200519
11 200718
12 200817
13 201415
14 201313
15 201213
16 200810
17 201510
18 20168
19 20227
20 20217

About Michael R. Due

Michael R. Due is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (4 papers), Veterinary Equine Medical Research (4 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications (3 papers) and Pharmacological Effects and Assays (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (265 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (85 citations), Equine (20 citations), Physiology (223 citations) and Neurology (52 citations). Michael R. Due has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Fletcher A. White, Rajesh Khanna, Matthew S. Ripsch, Polina Feldman, Klaudiusz R. Weiss, Jian Jing, Yohance M. Allette, Andrew D. Piekarz, Sarah M. Wilson and Kosei Sasaki. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Journal of Neuroinflammation and ACS Chemical Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact