Diane Gromala

2.2k citations
64 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 18

Diane Gromala

56 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Diane Gromala
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Human-Computer Interaction 511
  • Applied Psychology 122
  • Rehabilitation 111
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 263
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 59
Replace Naseem Ahmadpour with:
Naseem Ahmadpour Australia
Andrea Stevenson Won United States
Mark W. Reid United States
Claudia Repetto Italy
Bernie Garrett Canada
Jennifer Martin United Kingdom
Aneesha Singh United Kingdom
Andrea Chirico Italy
Elisa Pedroli Italy
Xin Tong China
Diane Gromala relative to Naseem Ahmadpour Australia Naseem Ahmadpour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Naseem Ahmadpour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Gromala

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Gromala's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Gromala with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Gromala more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Gromala

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Gromala. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Gromala. The network helps show where Diane Gromala may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Gromala, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Gromala Line = papers co-authored together Diane Gromala links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20237
2 202040
3 202050
4 202029
5 202015
6 2018162
7 201710
8 20172
9 20171
10
Usability Comparisons of Head-Mounted vs. Stereoscopic Desktop Displays in a Virtual Reality Environment with Pain Patients.
201622
11 20168
12
A Virtual Reality Game for Chronic Pain Management: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.
201649
13 20141
14 2014139
15 201340
16 20124
17 201117
18 20101
19
Windows and Mirrors: Interaction Design, Digital Art, and the Myth of Transparency (Leonardo Books)
200510
20 2003134

About Diane Gromala

Diane Gromala is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (23 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (12 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (12 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (8 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (7 papers), Human Motion and Animation (4 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (3 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (511 citations), Applied Psychology (122 citations) and Rehabilitation (111 citations). Diane Gromala has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jay David Bolter, Chris Shaw, Xin Tong, Bernie Garrett, Tarnia Taverner, Bernhard E. Riecke, Weina Jin, Elliott Cordingley, Gordon Tao and Crystal Sun. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Clinical Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026