P. Storck

729 citations
43 papers · 512 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

P. Storck

43 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

P. Storck
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Condensed Matter Physics 92
  • Structural Biology 10
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 361
  • Materials Chemistry 284
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 106
Replace Alexander N. Chaika with:
Alexander N. Chaika Russia
Masakuni Okamoto Japan
Franklin Liou United States
Joshua Leveillee United States
A. J. Leyendecker United States
Fulvio Paleari Italy
Cole Ritter United States
T.-W. Pi Taiwan
J. Kouvetakis United States
А. А. Захаров Sweden
P. Storck relative to Alexander N. Chaika Russia Alexander N. Chaika's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Alexander N. Chaika · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Storck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Storck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Storck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Storck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Storck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Storck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Storck. The network helps show where P. Storck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Storck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Storck Line = papers co-authored together P. Storck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200639
2 200937
3 201534
4 201028
5 200827
6 200926
7 201125
8 200521
9 201421
10 200820
11 200917
12 201214
13 201914
14 199113
15 201313
16 200813
17 201012
18 200911
19 201511
20 201510

About P. Storck

P. Storck is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 512 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (23 papers), Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (11 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (9 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (9 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (8 papers), Thin-Film Transistor Technologies (7 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (7 papers) and ZnO doping and properties (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (92 citations), Structural Biology (10 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (361 citations), Materials Chemistry (284 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (106 citations). P. Storck has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Schroeder, P. Zaumseil, A. Giussani, H.‐J. Müssig, G. Weidner, O. Seifarth, Alarich Weiß, J. Da̧browski, Christian Wenger and Markus Andreas Schubert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Applied Physics Letters, New Journal of Physics, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces and Journal of Crystal Growth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact