P. D. King
- Insect Science top 5%
- Plant Science
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Ecology
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- C.F. MercerJ.S. MeekingsRichard SmartRobert A. EastGabriel RillingR. P. PottingerT. K. CrosbyR.N. Watson
- Topics
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (9 papers)
- Cited by
- Insect ScienceTourism, Leisure and Hospitality ManagementEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- Food ChemistryAmerican Journal of Enology and ViticultureEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
- Partner nations
- New ZealandCzechiaFiji
In The Last Decade
P. D. King
33 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Insect Science 184
- Plant Science 158
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 143
- Ecology 76
- Food Science 50
Countries citing papers authored by P. D. King
This map shows the geographic impact of P. D. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. D. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. D. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by P. D. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. D. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. D. King. The network helps show where P. D. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of P. D. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P. D. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P. D. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P. D. King. P. D. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About P. D. King
P. D. King is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Insect Science and Paleontology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (10 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (184 citations), Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (13 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (143 citations). P. D. King has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Czechia and Fiji. Frequent co-authors include C.F. Mercer, J.S. Meekings, Richard Smart, Robert A. East, Gabriel Rilling, R. P. Pottinger, T. K. Crosby, R.N. Watson, J.F. Longworth and Sandy M. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Food Chemistry, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.