C.F. Mercer
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems 11
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 9
- Plant Science top 5%
- Nematode management and characterization studies 29
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis 14
- Soybean genetics and cultivation 9
- Cassava research and cyanide 7
- Forestry top 5%
-
- Plant and fungal interactions 7
-
- Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography 6
- Co-authors
- P. D. KingJ.S. MeekingsD.R. WoodfieldG. W. YeatesDavid GreenwoodR.N. WatsonAnthony J. ConnerP.J. Wigley
- Journals
- New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research (12 papers)Journal of Invertebrate Pathology (3 papers)Physiotherapy (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
C.F. Mercer
61 papers receiving 774 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Agronomy and Crop Science 200
- Insect Science 217
- Plant Science 490
- Forestry 48
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 207
Countries citing papers authored by C.F. Mercer
This map shows the geographic impact of C.F. Mercer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C.F. Mercer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C.F. Mercer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C.F. Mercer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C.F. Mercer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C.F. Mercer. The network helps show where C.F. Mercer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C.F. Mercer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 14 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1995 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1994 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1992 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1982 | 11 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1981 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 19 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 11 |
About C.F. Mercer
C.F. Mercer is a scholar working on Insect Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, Paleontology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 856 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nematode management and characterization studies (29 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (14 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (11 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (9 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (9 papers), Cassava research and cyanide (7 papers), Plant and fungal interactions (7 papers) and Scarabaeidae Beetle Taxonomy and Biogeography (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (200 citations), Insect Science (217 citations), Plant Science (490 citations), Forestry (48 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (207 citations). C.F. Mercer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include P. D. King, J.S. Meekings, D.R. Woodfield, G. W. Yeates, David Greenwood, R.N. Watson, Anthony J. Conner, P.J. Wigley, Surinder Saggar and N.L. Bell. Their work appears in journals such as New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, Physiotherapy, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.