P. Butera

1.5k citations
69 papers · 1.1k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

P. Butera

65 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

P. Butera
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Condensed Matter Physics 789
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 309
  • Mathematical Physics 217
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 502
  • Statistics and Probability 106
Replace N. E. Frankel with:
N. E. Frankel Australia
Mikio Sato Japan
K. A. Penson France
Moshe Moshe Israel
A. G. Izergin Russia
Lawrence J. Landau United Kingdom
Jacques H. H. Perk United States
Lawrence E. Thomas United States
Nicolas Sourlas France
Jan Philip Solovej Denmark
P. Butera relative to N. E. Frankel Australia N. E. Frankel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
N. E. Frankel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. Butera

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. Butera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. Butera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. Butera more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. Butera

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. Butera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. Butera. The network helps show where P. Butera may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. Butera, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. Butera Line = papers co-authored together P. Butera links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1971145
2 1997103
3 200273
4 198763
5 199548
6 199846
7 199640
8 198833
9 199331
10 200030
11 199429
12 201827
13 200226
14 199025
15 199724
16 198622
17 199922
18 197020
19 198918
20 197118

About P. Butera

P. Butera is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theoretical and Computational Physics (43 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (23 papers), Quantum many-body systems (15 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (8 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (8 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (6 papers) and Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (789 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (309 citations), Mathematical Physics (217 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (502 citations) and Statistics and Probability (106 citations). P. Butera has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include M. Comi, M. Pernici, G. Marchesini, L. Girardello, V. Bargmann, John R. Klauder, G. M. Prosperi, Bertrand Berche, Lev Shchur and A J Guttmann. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Nuclear Physics B, Physical Review B, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications and Computer Physics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact