Otto Laske
Impact in
- Music top 2%
- Diverse Musicological Studies
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Coaching Methods and Impact
Papers in
-
- Music Technology and Sound Studies 26
-
- Music and Audio Processing 14
- Co-authors
- Barry Truax (1 shared paper)Kemal Ebci̇oğlu (3 shared papers)Mira Balaban (3 shared papers)Marc Leman (1 shared paper)Marvin Minsky (1 shared paper)Curtis Roads (2 shared papers)Eleanor Selfridge-Field (1 shared paper)Joel Chadabe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Computer Music Journal (13 papers)AI Magazine (1 paper)Notes (1 paper)Journal of Management Development (1 paper)Psychology of Music (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Otto Laske
46 papers receiving 406 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Music 68
- Applied Psychology 79
- Signal Processing 161
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 237
- Architecture 15
Countries citing papers authored by Otto Laske
This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Laske's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Laske with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Laske more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Laske
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Laske. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Laske. The network helps show where Otto Laske may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Otto Laske, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 159 | |
| 2 | 1999 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 39 | |
| 4 | Understanding Music with AI | 1991 | 29 |
| 5 | 1989 | 25 | |
| 6 | Transformative effects of coaching on executives' professional agenda. | 1999 | 24 |
| 7 | 1987 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 18 | |
| 10 | 1981 | 18 | |
| 11 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1991 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 20 | Subscore Manipulation as a Tool for Compositional and Sonic Design | 1980 | 5 |
About Otto Laske
Otto Laske is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing, Music, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 587 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music Technology and Sound Studies (26 papers), Music and Audio Processing (14 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (9 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers), Ego Development and Educational Practices (7 papers), Coaching Methods and Impact (6 papers), Design Education and Practice (5 papers) and Musicology and Musical Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (68 citations), Applied Psychology (79 citations), Signal Processing (161 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (237 citations) and Architecture (15 citations). Otto Laske has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Barry Truax, Kemal Ebci̇oğlu, Mira Balaban, Marc Leman, Marvin Minsky, Curtis Roads, Eleanor Selfridge-Field, Joel Chadabe and Marc Battier. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Music Journal, AI Magazine, Notes, Journal of Management Development and Psychology of Music.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.