Otto Demus
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History 7
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 2
- History top 5%
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 7
- Medieval History and Crusades 1
- Archeology top 10%
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 2
- Archaeological and Historical Studies 1
- General Arts and Humanities top 10%
-
- Architecture and Art History Studies 2
-
- 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage 2
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryArcheology
- Journals
- The Art Bulletin (4 papers)Dumbarton Oaks Papers (2 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Otto Demus
11 papers receiving 50 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Classics 49
- History 40
- Archeology 30
- General Arts and Humanities 3
- Theoretical Computer Science 2
Countries citing papers authored by Otto Demus
This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Demus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Demus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Demus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Demus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Demus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Demus. The network helps show where Otto Demus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Otto Demus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Studies in Byzantium, Venice and the West | 1998 | 0 |
| 2 | Oxford College Libraries | 1997 | 1 |
| 3 | Die byzantinischen Mosaikikonen | 1991 | 1 |
| 4 | 1989 | 16 | |
| 5 | The medieval mosaics of San Marco, Venice : a color archive | 1986 | 1 |
| 6 | 1979 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 2 | |
| 8 | Oxford Bodleian Library | 1977 | 12 |
| 9 | Byzantine Mosaic Decoration: Aspects of Monumental Art in Byzantium | 1976 | 20 |
| 10 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 11 | Early Christian and Byzantine art | 1971 | 11 |
| 12 | La peinture murale romane | 1970 | 4 |
| 13 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 14 | Romanesque mural painting | 1970 | 7 |
| 15 | The Church of San Marco in Venice : history, architecture, sculpture | 1960 | 6 |
| 16 | 1960 | 2 | |
| 17 | Die Entstehung des Paläologenstils in der Malerei | 1958 | 1 |
About Otto Demus
Otto Demus is a scholar working on Classics, Space and Planetary Science, History, Archeology and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 17 papers that have together received 92 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers), Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (2 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (1 paper) and Medieval History and Crusades (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (49 citations), History (40 citations), Archeology (30 citations), General Arts and Humanities (3 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include Doula Mouriki, Hans Belting, Max Hirmer and Kenneth M. Setton. Their work appears in journals such as The Art Bulletin, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks and University of Chicago Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.