Otto Demus

527 total citations
17 papers, 92 citations indexed

About

Otto Demus is a scholar working on Classics, History and Archeology. According to data from OpenAlex, Otto Demus has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 92 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Classics, 8 papers in History and 5 papers in Archeology. Recurrent topics in Otto Demus's work include Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers) and Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers). Otto Demus is often cited by papers focused on Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (7 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (7 papers) and Architecture and Art History Studies (2 papers). Otto Demus collaborates with scholars based in . Otto Demus's co-authors include Doula Mouriki, Hans Belting, Max Hirmer and Kenneth M. Setton and has published in prestigious journals such as The Art Bulletin, Dumbarton Oaks Papers and University of Chicago Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Otto Demus

11 papers receiving 50 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Otto Demus	7	49	40	30	13	10	17	92
Walter Cahn United States	6	71 1.4×	72 1.8×	26 0.9×	11 0.8×	11 1.1×	35	128
Leonard E. Boyle	6	40 0.8×	41 1.0×	10 0.3×	8 0.6×	8 0.8×	21	97
Madeline H. Caviness United States	6	59 1.2×	54 1.4×	21 0.7×	10 0.8×	9 0.9×	34	108
J. A. Jungmann	5	48 1.0×	59 1.5×	13 0.4×	14 1.1×	4 0.4×	12	101
Bede	3	35 0.7×	32 0.8×	8 0.3×	14 1.1×	9 0.9×	4	85
Doula Mouriki	5	60 1.2×	38 0.9×	25 0.8×	9 0.7×	19 1.9×	19	74
Anthony Luttrell United Kingdom	6	50 1.0×	59 1.5×	45 1.5×	14 1.1×	19 1.9×	66	113
Amy G. Remensnyder Germany	6	35 0.7×	46 1.1×	15 0.5×	12 0.9×	6 0.6×	12	89
Émile Mâle	5	33 0.7×	38 0.9×	12 0.4×	5 0.4×	9 0.9×	13	79
Agostino Paravicini Bagliani Switzerland	6	40 0.8×	62 1.6×	17 0.6×	8 0.6×	12 1.2×	47	113

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Demus

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Demus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Demus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Demus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Demus

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Demus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Demus. The network helps show where Otto Demus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Otto Demus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Otto Demus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Otto Demus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Otto Demus. Otto Demus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Demus, Otto. (1998). Studies in Byzantium, Venice and the West.

2.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1997). Oxford College Libraries. 1 indexed citations

3.

Demus, Otto. (1991). Die byzantinischen Mosaikikonen. Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks. 1 indexed citations

4.

Mouriki, Doula & Otto Demus. (1989). The Mosaics of San Marco in Venice. The Art Bulletin. 71(1). 132–132. 16 indexed citations

5.

Demus, Otto. (1986). The medieval mosaics of San Marco, Venice : a color archive. University of Chicago Press eBooks. 1 indexed citations

6.

Demus, Otto. (1979). Venetian Mosaics and Their Byzantine Sources: Report on the Dumbarton Oaks Symposium of 1978. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 33. 337–337.

7.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1979). A History of the Crusades, IV: The Art and Architecture of the Crusader States. The Art Bulletin. 61(4). 636–636. 2 indexed citations

8.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1977). Oxford Bodleian Library. 12 indexed citations

9.

Demus, Otto. (1976). Byzantine Mosaic Decoration: Aspects of Monumental Art in Byzantium. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 20 indexed citations

10.

Belting, Hans & Otto Demus. (1972). Byzantine Art and the West. The Art Bulletin. 54(4). 542–542. 7 indexed citations

11.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1971). Early Christian and Byzantine art. 11 indexed citations

12.

Demus, Otto & Max Hirmer. (1970). La peinture murale romane. Flammarion eBooks. 4 indexed citations

13.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1970). Il Tesoro di San Marco e la sua Storia. The Art Bulletin. 52(3). 309–309. 1 indexed citations

14.

Demus, Otto. (1970). Romanesque mural painting. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 7 indexed citations

15.

Demus, Otto, et al.. (1960). The Church of San Marco in Venice : history, architecture, sculpture. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 6 indexed citations

16.

Demus, Otto. (1960). Two Palaeologan Mosaic Icons in the Dumbarton Oaks Collection. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 14. 87–87. 2 indexed citations

17.

Demus, Otto. (1958). Die Entstehung des Paläologenstils in der Malerei. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact