Otto Bird

474 total citations
15 papers, 65 citations indexed

About

Otto Bird is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Classics. According to data from OpenAlex, Otto Bird has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 65 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in History and Philosophy of Science and 1 paper in Classics. Recurrent topics in Otto Bird's work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (1 paper). Otto Bird is often cited by papers focused on Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (1 paper) and Eurasian Exchange Networks (1 paper). Otto Bird collaborates with scholars based in Algeria and United States. Otto Bird's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Philosophy of Science, Mind and The Classical World.

In The Last Decade

Otto Bird

13 papers receiving 45 citations

Peers

Otto Bird
Ivan Boh United States
Otto Bird
Citations per year, relative to Otto Bird Otto Bird (= 1×) peers Ivan Boh

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Bird

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Bird more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Bird

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Bird. The network helps show where Otto Bird may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Bird, Otto, et al.. (1978). Cultures in Conflict. An Essay in the Philosophy of the Humanities. The Classical World. 71(7). 494–494. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bird, Otto. (1976). Cultures in conflict: An essay in the philosophy of the humanities. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations
3.
Bird, Otto. (1969). Aristotle’s Theory of the Syllogism. Philosophical Studies. 18(0). 319–319. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bird, Otto. (1964). Syllogistic and its extensions. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 9 indexed citations
5.
Bird, Otto. (1962). The Tradition of the Logical Topics: Aristotle to Ockham. Journal of the History of Ideas. 23(3). 307–307. 14 indexed citations
6.
Bird, Otto. (1962). What Pierce means by leading principles.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 3(3). 2 indexed citations
7.
Bird, Otto. (1961). Topic and consequences in Ockham's logic.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 2(2). 1 indexed citations
8.
Bird, Otto. (1961). THE RE-DISCOVERY OF THE TOPICE. Mind. LXX(280). 534–539. 10 indexed citations
9.
Bird, Otto. (1960). ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association. 34. 200–205. 4 indexed citations
10.
Bird, Otto. (1960). The formalizing of the topics in mediaeval logic.. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. 1(4). 7 indexed citations
11.
Bird, Otto. (1959). Whitehead’s Metaphysics. New Scholasticism. 33(4). 531–532. 1 indexed citations
12.
Bird, Otto. (1959). The Logical Interest of the Topics as Seen in Abelard. The Modern Schoolman. 37(1). 53–57.
13.
Bird, Otto. (1959). Peirce's Theory of Methodology. Philosophy of Science. 26(3). 187–200. 10 indexed citations
14.
Bird, Otto. (1956). The Metalogicon of John of Salisbury. New Scholasticism. 30(2). 237–238. 1 indexed citations
15.
Bird, Otto. (1953). How to Read an Article of the Summa. New Scholasticism. 27(2). 129–159.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026