Olivia De Smet

556 total citations
12 papers, 393 citations indexed

About

Olivia De Smet is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Olivia De Smet has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 393 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 4 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Olivia De Smet's work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (4 papers). Olivia De Smet is often cited by papers focused on Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers) and Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (4 papers). Olivia De Smet collaborates with scholars based in Belgium and United States. Olivia De Smet's co-authors include Ann Buysse, Tom Loeys, Beatrijs Moerkerke, Sabine Hellemans, William L. Cook, Ruben Brondeel, Alexis Dewaele, Marieke Dewitte, Kasia Uzieblo and Thomas Onraedt and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Family Psychology, Multivariate Behavioral Research and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

In The Last Decade

Olivia De Smet

11 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers

Olivia De Smet
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Health 125
  • Sociology and Political Science 125
  • Clinical Psychology 112
  • Social Psychology 100
  • Gender Studies 50
Replace Nadine Recker Rayburn with:
Nadine Recker Rayburn United States
Robert M. Fernquist United States
Wing-Shing Chan United States
F. Stephen Bridges United States
Nancy A. Morris United States
Héctor Monterde-i-Bort Spain
Marc Riedel United States
Hilary Schofield Australia
Aldred H. Neufeldt Canada
Jennifer E. V. Lloyd Canada
Nadine Recker Rayburn United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Olivia De Smet
Olivia De Smet · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Olivia De Smet
Olivia De Smet · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Olivia De Smet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Olivia De Smet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olivia De Smet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olivia De Smet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Olivia De Smet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olivia De Smet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olivia De Smet. The network helps show where Olivia De Smet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olivia De Smet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olivia De Smet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olivia De Smet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olivia De Smet. Olivia De Smet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 35
2 30
3 26
4 11
5 20
6 41
7 32
8 12
9 25
10
Unwanted pursuit behavior in hetero- and homosexual relationships: Prevalence and its relation with personality, empathy, rumination and attachment style
0
11 20
12 141

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026