F. Stephen Bridges

565 total citations
52 papers, 449 citations indexed

About

F. Stephen Bridges is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Stephen Bridges has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 449 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 18 papers in Clinical Psychology and 10 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in F. Stephen Bridges's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (7 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (6 papers). F. Stephen Bridges is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (7 papers) and Gun Ownership and Violence Research (6 papers). F. Stephen Bridges collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and China. F. Stephen Bridges's co-authors include Julie C. Kunselman, Paul S. F. Yip, Chi‐Ting Yang, David Lester, Celia Williamson, Xuan Tran, B. Sue Graves, R. Carl Westerfield, Mara S. Aruguete and Jennifer S. Parker and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Biology of Reproduction and Forensic Science International.

In The Last Decade

F. Stephen Bridges

48 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Stephen Bridges United States	12	226	209	156	52	48	52	449
Nadine Recker Rayburn United States	12	157 0.7×	222 1.1×	87 0.6×	125 2.4×	7 0.1×	17	507
Brian W. Flynn United States	15	86 0.4×	429 2.1×	42 0.3×	65 1.3×	23 0.5×	29	566
Jane Derges United Kingdom	11	92 0.4×	157 0.8×	34 0.2×	91 1.8×	14 0.3×	23	339
Nathaniel J. Pollock Canada	11	120 0.5×	173 0.8×	193 1.2×	61 1.2×	18 0.4×	34	484
Annah K. Bender United States	10	122 0.5×	116 0.6×	96 0.6×	33 0.6×	10 0.2×	31	344
Sara F. Stein United States	12	79 0.3×	201 1.0×	246 1.6×	66 1.3×	7 0.1×	37	376
Shalini Mittal India	4	97 0.4×	135 0.6×	114 0.7×	58 1.1×	7 0.1×	9	390
Laura Šinko United States	11	113 0.5×	262 1.3×	163 1.0×	36 0.7×	11 0.2×	42	406
Richard Stansfield United States	17	627 2.8×	336 1.6×	374 2.4×	36 0.7×	11 0.2×	59	835
Markus J. Strauss Austria	8	127 0.6×	479 2.3×	100 0.6×	251 4.8×	20 0.4×	9	607

Countries citing papers authored by F. Stephen Bridges

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Stephen Bridges's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Stephen Bridges with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Stephen Bridges more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Stephen Bridges

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Stephen Bridges. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Stephen Bridges. The network helps show where F. Stephen Bridges may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Stephen Bridges

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Stephen Bridges. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Stephen Bridges based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Stephen Bridges. F. Stephen Bridges is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bridges, F. Stephen & David Lester. (2010). Homicide–suicide in the United States, 1968–1975. Forensic Science International. 206(1-3). 185–189. 25 indexed citations

Tran, Xuan & F. Stephen Bridges. (2009). Tourism and Crime in European Nations. Ereview of tourism research. 7(3). 52–67. 12 indexed citations

Bridges, F. Stephen. (2009). Relationship between Dietary Beef, Fat, and Pork and Alcoholic Cirrhosis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 6(9). 2417–2425. 5 indexed citations

McCutcheon, Lynn E., et al.. (2008). Psychological adjustment profiles of talented professional baseball players: Pitchers versus hitters. Journal of international women's studies. 10(2). 313.

Bridges, F. Stephen, Paul S. F. Yip, & Chi‐Ting Yang. (2005). Seasonal Changes in Suicide in the United States, 1971 to 2000. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 100(3_suppl). 920–924. 41 indexed citations

Bridges, F. Stephen. (2005). PREMATURE MORTALITY DUE TO SUICIDE, HOMICIDE, AND MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS IN HEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY AREAS: COMPARISON OF STATUS INDIANS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA, WITH ALL OTHER RESIDENTS. Psychological Reports. 97(7). 739–739. 3 indexed citations

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2004). Suicide and Homicide in Rural Areas of California. Psychological Reports. 95(3). 905–906. 4 indexed citations

Bridges, F. Stephen. (2004). SUICIDE AND HOMICIDE IN RURAL AREAS OF CALIFORNIA. Psychological Reports. 95(7). 905–905. 1 indexed citations

Bridges, F. Stephen. (2004). Age-Adjusted Rates of Suicide and Homicide and Fluoride. Psychological Reports. 94(1). 221–224. 1 indexed citations

10.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2002). Responses to Lost Letters about a 2000 General Election Amendment to Abolish Prohibition of Interracial Marriages in Alabama. Psychological Reports. 91(3_suppl). 1148–1150. 4 indexed citations

11.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2002). Extensions of the Lost Letter Technique to Divisive Issues of Creationism, Darwinism, Sex Education, and Gay and Lesbian Affiliations. Psychological Reports. 90(2). 391–400. 10 indexed citations

12.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2001). Differences in Lost Letter Responses from a Seaside City. Psychological Reports. 88(3_suppl). 1194–1198. 5 indexed citations

13.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2000). Lost Letter Returns on Five Topics from Urban, Waterfront, and Smaller Rural Communities. Psychological Reports. 86(3_suppl). 1097–1100. 8 indexed citations

14.

Bridges, F. Stephen. (2000). AFFILIATION, COMMUNITY SIZE, AND PERSON-POSITTVTTY EFFECT IN RETURN OF LOST LETTERS. Psychological Reports. 87(7). 1003–1003. 1 indexed citations

15.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (2000). Lost Letter Returns on Five Topics from Urban, Waterfront, and Smaller Rural Communities. Psychological Reports. 86(3_part_2). 1097–1100. 3 indexed citations

16.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (1999). Impeachment Affiliation and Levels of Response to Lost Letters. Psychological Reports. 84(3). 828–830. 4 indexed citations

17.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (1998). Affiliation, Community Size, and Destination in Return of Lost Letters. Psychological Reports. 83(3_suppl). 1387–1393. 7 indexed citations

18.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (1997). Differences in Lost Letter and Postal Card Returns from Cities and Smaller Urban Communities. Psychological Reports. 80(2). 363–368. 19 indexed citations

19.

Bridges, F. Stephen, et al.. (1996). Urban Size Differences in Incidence of Altruistic Behavior. Psychological Reports. 78(1). 307–312. 23 indexed citations

20.

Bridges, F. Stephen. (1996). Altruism toward Deviant Persons in Cities, Suburbs, and Small Towns. Psychological Reports. 79(1). 313–314. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact