Oliver P. Williams
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Public Administration top 10%
- Urban Studies top 10%
- Topics
- Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper)Taxation and Compliance Studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- Administrative Science QuarterlyAmerican Sociological ReviewAmerican Political Science Review
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Oliver P. Williams
16 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Political Science and International Relations 137
- Sociology and Political Science 122
- Economics and Econometrics 54
- Public Administration 50
- Urban Studies 24
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver P. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver P. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver P. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver P. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver P. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver P. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver P. Williams. The network helps show where Oliver P. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Oliver P. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Oliver P. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Oliver P. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Oliver P. Williams. Oliver P. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Judeo-Christian vision and the modern corporation | 8 |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | Contact and Support: An Empirical Assessment of Public Attitudes toward the Police and the Courts | 56 |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Democracy in the fifty States | 1 |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 29 |
About Oliver P. Williams
Oliver P. Williams is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Finance and Philosophy, having authored 17 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (50 citations), Political Science and International Relations (137 citations) and Urban Studies (24 citations). Oliver P. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Charles R. Adrian, Thomas R. Dye, Charles S. Liebman and Dennis J. Palumbo. Their work appears in journals such as Administrative Science Quarterly, American Sociological Review and American Political Science Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.