Oliver Feeney
Impact in
-
- Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Papers in
- Physiology 10
- Biomedical Ethics and Regulation 10
-
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 7
- Co-authors
- Sigrid Sterckx (4 shared papers)Julian Cockbain (2 shared papers)Matthias Wjst (2 shared papers)Timo Minssen (4 shared papers)Kirmo Wartiovaara (2 shared papers)Kristof Van Assche (1 shared paper)Michael Morrison (1 shared paper)Heike Felzmann (5 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Oliver Feeney
20 papers receiving 178 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Business and International Management 16
- Management of Technology and Innovation 14
- Physiology 38
- Genetics 39
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 35
Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Feeney
This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Feeney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Feeney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Feeney. The network helps show where Oliver Feeney may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oliver Feeney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 5 | Response to Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ Genome editing and human reproduction: open call for evidence | 2018 | 17 |
| 6 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 15 | Incentives, Genetics and the Egalitarian Ethos | 2012 | 1 |
| 16 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 1 |
About Oliver Feeney
Oliver Feeney is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Business and International Management, having authored 22 papers that have together received 186 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (10 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Intellectual Property and Patents (2 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (16 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (14 citations), Physiology (38 citations), Genetics (39 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (35 citations). Oliver Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Sigrid Sterckx, Julian Cockbain, Matthias Wjst, Timo Minssen, Kirmo Wartiovaara, Kristof Van Assche, Michael Morrison, Heike Felzmann, Pascal Borry and Danya F. Vears. Their work appears in journals such as Human Genomics, Res Publica, Journal of Perinatology, Bioethics and Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.