Oliver Black

27 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

Oliver Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Health Professions 58
  • Applied Psychology 11
  • Philosophy 24
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
  • History and Philosophy of Science 7
Replace Mette Haaland‐Øverby with:
Mette Haaland‐Øverby Norway
Gail Eva United Kingdom
Shamshad Begum Pakistan
Jason A Wolf United States
Othman A. Alfuqaha Jordan
Julia Shaw‐Kokot United States
Sara McPherson United States
Kuei-Yun Lu Taiwan
Niels Janssen Netherlands
Gavan R. Palk Australia
Oliver Black relative to Mette Haaland‐Øverby Norway Mette Haaland‐Øverby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Mette Haaland‐Øverby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Oliver Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Oliver Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Oliver Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Oliver Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Oliver Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Oliver Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Oliver Black. The network helps show where Oliver Black may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Oliver Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Oliver Black Line = papers co-authored together Oliver Black links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201751
2 201844
3 201330
4 201824
5
The UK Department for Environment, Food And Rural Affairs ("Defra") publishes the final report of the Cave review of competition and innovation in water markets
200923
6 198813
7
Infinite Regress Arguments and Infinite Regresses
200111
8 200511
9 201711
10 201610
11 20168
12 20196
13 20046
14 20045
15 20074
16 20033
17 20053
18 20192
19 20122
20 19942

About Oliver Black

Oliver Black is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Health, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Law, having authored 32 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (6 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Legal principles and applications (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (58 citations), Applied Psychology (11 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (7 citations). Oliver Black has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Smith, Alex Collie, Tessa Keegel, Malcolm Sim, Emmanuel Kuntsche, Paul A. Agius, Margaret Hellard, Robin Room, Megan S. C. Lim and Paul Dietze. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, European Competition Journal, Legal Theory and Law and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact