Megan S. C. Lim

6.6k citations
137 papers · 4.1k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 34

Megan S. C. Lim

133 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Hit Papers

Young Adults’ Use of Different Social Media Platforms for...1152022202620232024255075100

Peers

Megan S. C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
  • Applied Psychology 478
  • Gender Studies 712
  • General Health Professions 1.5k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Health 365
Replace Kathleen A. Ethier with:
Kathleen A. Ethier United States
Amy Bleakley United States
Richard de Visser United Kingdom
Kathy Harrington United States
Claire D. Brindis United States
Marian Pitts Australia
Paul Flowers United Kingdom
Kerstin E. E. Schröder United States
John de Wit Netherlands
Freya L. Sonenstein United States
Megan S. C. Lim relative to Kathleen A. Ethier United States Kathleen A. Ethier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kathleen A. Ethier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan S. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan S. C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan S. C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan S. C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan S. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan S. C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan S. C. Lim. The network helps show where Megan S. C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan S. C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan S. C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together Megan S. C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20250
4 20241
5 20241
6 20231
7 20226
8 202226
9 20225
10 20205
11 20209
12 2020110
13 201841
14 201843
15 201842
16 201713
17 201645
18 20156
19
Placing prevention in the pockets: The role of mHealth in preventive medical services
20141
20 200711

About Megan S. C. Lim

Megan S. C. Lim is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 137 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (29 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (28 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (26 papers), Sex work and related issues (25 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (22 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (21 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (19 papers) and HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (478 citations), Gender Studies (712 citations) and General Health Professions (1.5k citations). Megan S. C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Margaret Hellard, Elise Carrotte, Jane S. Hocking, Campbell Aitken, Ivanka Prichard, Alyce M. Vella, Cassandra Wright, Linda Brennan, Judy Gold and Paul Dietze. Their work appears in journals such as Sexual Health, Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, International Journal of STD & AIDS and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026