Olimpia Pino
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Giuseppe PalestraBerardina De CarolisAndrea SgoifoMaria A. Pico-AlfonsoGian Paolo CedaMassimo ManghiAlfonso TroisiGraziano Ceresini
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers)Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Olimpia Pino
25 papers receiving 296 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Social Psychology 94
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Cognitive Neuroscience 54
- Behavioral Neuroscience 40
- Psychiatry and Mental health 40
Countries citing papers authored by Olimpia Pino
This map shows the geographic impact of Olimpia Pino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olimpia Pino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olimpia Pino more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Olimpia Pino
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olimpia Pino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olimpia Pino. The network helps show where Olimpia Pino may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olimpia Pino
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olimpia Pino. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olimpia Pino based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olimpia Pino. Olimpia Pino is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | Using the Pepper Robot in Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for People with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia | 6 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 78 | |
| 10 | Does the mindful attention awareness predict abstinence from nicotine smoking 24-h into a cessation programme? | 0 |
| 11 | Will Humanoid Robots Become an Assistive Technology for People with Special Needs | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Risk factors of road crash: An empirical analysis among an Italian drivers sample | 1 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Olimpia Pino
Olimpia Pino is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (40 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations) and Occupational Therapy (22 citations). Olimpia Pino has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Giuseppe Palestra, Berardina De Carolis, Andrea Sgoifo, Maria A. Pico-Alfonso, Gian Paolo Ceda, Massimo Manghi, Alfonso Troisi, Graziano Ceresini, Francesca Mastorci and Diana Poli. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Psychoneuroendocrinology and International Psychogeriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.