Jaime K. Devine

620 citations
35 papers · 421 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jaime K. Devine

27 papers receiving 411 citations

Peers

Jaime K. Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 264
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 69
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 157
  • Occupational Therapy 25
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 17
Replace Cátia Reis with:
Cátia Reis Portugal
Sara C. Bessman United States
Leigh McGraw United States
Kaisu Martinmäki Finland
Scott G. Williams United States
Sonia Ancoli-Israel United States
Jason Jameson United States
Vanessa Ibáñez-del Valle Spain
Simon A. Rego United States
Hye-Sue Song United States
Jaime K. Devine relative to Cátia Reis Portugal Cátia Reis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Cátia Reis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime K. Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime K. Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime K. Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime K. Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime K. Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime K. Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime K. Devine. The network helps show where Jaime K. Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jaime K. Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaime K. Devine Line = papers co-authored together Jaime K. Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019164
2 201943
3 201527
4 201524
5 201823
6 202022
7 202016
8 202216
9 202315
10 202213
11 20199
12 20209
13 20206
14 20216
15 20215
16 20225
17 20234
18 20222
19 20242
20 20212

About Jaime K. Devine

Jaime K. Devine is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Occupational Therapy, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (20 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (17 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (9 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (7 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (3 papers) and Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (264 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (69 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (157 citations), Occupational Therapy (25 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations). Jaime K. Devine has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jutta M. Wolf, Christopher M. Depner, Seema Khosla, Andrew Vakulin, Philip Cheng, Rébecca Robillard, Sean P. A. Drummond, Massimiliano de Zambotti, Steven R. Hursh and Lindsay P. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as SLEEP, Journal of surgical education, Military Medical Research, Sensors and Sleep Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact