Ofra Amir

1.2k citations
44 papers · 729 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Ofra Amir

44 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

Ofra Amir
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • General Decision Sciences 60
  • Safety Research 214
  • Computer Science Applications 59
  • Health Informatics 13
  • Artificial Intelligence 253
Replace Karel Van den Bosch with:
Karel Van den Bosch Netherlands
Hansjörg Neth Germany
Abdullah Almaatouq United States
Eyal Péer Israel
Thilo Hagendorff Germany
Ziv Epstein United States
Rafał Kocielnik United States
Elissa M. Redmiles United States
Elena Filatova United States
Mallory C. Kidwell United States
Ofra Amir relative to Karel Van den Bosch Netherlands Karel Van den Bosch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Karel Van den Bosch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ofra Amir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ofra Amir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ofra Amir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ofra Amir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ofra Amir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ofra Amir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ofra Amir. The network helps show where Ofra Amir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ofra Amir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ofra Amir Line = papers co-authored together Ofra Amir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012258
2
Interactive teaching strategies for agent training
201650
3 201841
4 202139
5 201537
6 202031
7 201126
8 201326
9 202126
10 201924
11 201521
12 202216
13 202212
14 20149
15 20188
16 20228
17 20227
18 20187
19 20227
20 20227

About Ofra Amir

Ofra Amir is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Infectious Diseases and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 729 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (9 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (8 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (7 papers), Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing (6 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (5 papers), SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (5 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers) and Topic Modeling (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (60 citations), Safety Research (214 citations), Computer Science Applications (59 citations), Health Informatics (13 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (253 citations). Ofra Amir has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kobi Gal, David G. Rand, Barbara J. Grosz, Andrey Kolobov, Ece Kamar, Finale Doshi‐Velez, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Lee Sanders, Mor Naaman and David Sarne. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial Intelligence, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact