Obdulia Martínez‐García
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Co-authors
- Benedicto Crespo‐FacorroRocío Pérez‐IglesiasJosé Luis Vázquez‐BarqueroJosé María Pelayo‐TeránIgnácio F. MataMariluz Ramírez-BonillaGema Pardo‐GarcíaJosé Manuel Rodríguez-Sánchez
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (34 papers)Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (16 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Obdulia Martínez‐García
39 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.4k
- Clinical Psychology 342
- Philosophy 326
- Physiology 257
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 211
Countries citing papers authored by Obdulia Martínez‐García
This map shows the geographic impact of Obdulia Martínez‐García's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Obdulia Martínez‐García with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Obdulia Martínez‐García more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Obdulia Martínez‐García
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Obdulia Martínez‐García. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Obdulia Martínez‐García. The network helps show where Obdulia Martínez‐García may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Obdulia Martínez‐García
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Obdulia Martínez‐García. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Obdulia Martínez‐García based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Obdulia Martínez‐García. Obdulia Martínez‐García is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 91 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 49 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 130 | |
| 19 | 97 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Obdulia Martínez‐García
Obdulia Martínez‐García is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Philosophy, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (34 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (16 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (1.4k citations), Biological Psychiatry (185 citations) and Philosophy (326 citations). Obdulia Martínez‐García has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benedicto Crespo‐Facorro, Rocío Pérez‐Iglesias, José Luis Vázquez‐Barquero, José María Pelayo‐Terán, Ignácio F. Mata, Mariluz Ramírez-Bonilla, Gema Pardo‐García, José Manuel Rodríguez-Sánchez, César González‐Blanch and Víctor Ortiz‐García de la Foz. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Psychopharmacology and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.