Noura Erakat
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Education
- Gender Studies
- General Health Professions
- Topics
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (14 papers)International Law and Human Rights (9 papers)Middle East Politics and Society (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsZimbabwe
In The Last Decade
Noura Erakat
18 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 162
- Political Science and International Relations 49
- Education 30
- Gender Studies 20
- General Health Professions 20
Countries citing papers authored by Noura Erakat
This map shows the geographic impact of Noura Erakat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noura Erakat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noura Erakat more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noura Erakat
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noura Erakat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noura Erakat. The network helps show where Noura Erakat may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noura Erakat
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noura Erakat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noura Erakat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noura Erakat. Noura Erakat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Whiteness as Property in Israel: Revival, Rehabilitation, and Removal | 13 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | The US v. The Red Cross: Customary International Humanitarian Law & Universal Jurisdiction | 1 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Human rights and the rule of law | 0 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | Arabiya made invisible: Between marginalization of agency and silencing of dissent | 1 |
| 20 | Operation Cast Lead: The Elusive Quest for Self-Defense in International Law | 1 |
About Noura Erakat
Noura Erakat is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 22 papers that have together received 218 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (14 papers), International Law and Human Rights (9 papers) and Middle East Politics and Society (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (162 citations), Gender Studies (20 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (49 citations). Noura Erakat has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include Paul C. Gorski, Marc Hill, Darryl Li, Vasuki Nesiah, John Reynolds, Richard Falk and Samera Esmeir. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, American Quarterly and Ethnicities.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.