Norbert Zmyj

1.5k total citations
52 papers, 903 citations indexed

About

Norbert Zmyj is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Norbert Zmyj has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 903 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 26 papers in Social Psychology and 14 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Norbert Zmyj's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers). Norbert Zmyj is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (31 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (13 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (12 papers). Norbert Zmyj collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and New Zealand. Norbert Zmyj's co-authors include Moritz M. Daum, David Buttelmann, Malinda Carpenter, Gisa Aschersleben, Sabine Seehagen, Wolfgang Prinz, Simone Schütz‐Bosbach, Mark Nielsen, Silvia Schneider and Julia Rudolph and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Child Development.

In The Last Decade

Norbert Zmyj

49 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Norbert Zmyj Germany 12 606 417 283 127 120 52 903
Sabina Pauen Germany 22 821 1.4× 466 1.1× 446 1.6× 61 0.5× 173 1.4× 98 1.3k
Claudia Thoermer Germany 17 718 1.2× 441 1.1× 478 1.7× 58 0.5× 188 1.6× 21 1.1k
Alessandra Geraci Italy 15 581 1.0× 449 1.1× 384 1.4× 211 1.7× 75 0.6× 40 905
Susanne Kristen Germany 16 581 1.0× 497 1.2× 366 1.3× 114 0.9× 121 1.0× 38 990
Peipei Setoh Singapore 17 309 0.5× 423 1.0× 326 1.2× 111 0.9× 99 0.8× 65 952
Anna Fritz Canada 5 780 1.3× 406 1.0× 385 1.4× 157 1.2× 147 1.2× 9 993
Francesca Bellagamba Italy 12 424 0.7× 234 0.6× 178 0.6× 133 1.0× 196 1.6× 29 717
Alia Martin United States 12 468 0.8× 331 0.8× 292 1.0× 116 0.9× 53 0.4× 23 775
Christine Fawcett Sweden 17 459 0.8× 363 0.9× 299 1.1× 136 1.1× 72 0.6× 40 844
Hanna Schleihauf Germany 11 259 0.4× 290 0.7× 254 0.9× 93 0.7× 68 0.6× 18 585

Countries citing papers authored by Norbert Zmyj

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Norbert Zmyj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Norbert Zmyj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Norbert Zmyj more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Norbert Zmyj

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Norbert Zmyj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Norbert Zmyj. The network helps show where Norbert Zmyj may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Norbert Zmyj

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Norbert Zmyj. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Norbert Zmyj based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Norbert Zmyj. Norbert Zmyj is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seehagen, Sabine, Christina Totzeck, Joscha Kärtner, et al.. (2025). Belong, Broaden, and Build: The Role of Positive Emotions in Early Human Development. Child Development Perspectives. 19(4). 237–243.
2.
Kumsta, Robert, et al.. (2023). A matter of habit? Stressful life events and cognitive flexibility in 15-month-olds. Infant Behavior and Development. 71. 101810–101810. 1 indexed citations
3.
Seehagen, Sabine, et al.. (2023). Stress affects the prediction of others’ behavior. PLoS ONE. 18(4). e0283782–e0283782. 2 indexed citations
4.
Margoni, Francesco, Katharina Block, J. Kiley Hamlin, Norbert Zmyj, & Toni Schmader. (2022). Meta-analytic evidence against sex differences in infants’ and toddlers’ preference for prosocial agents.. Developmental Psychology. 59(2). 229–235.
5.
Zmyj, Norbert, et al.. (2019). Reducing homonegativity among German adolescents: Results of a 6-week follow-up study. Journal of LGBT Youth. 16(4). 435–450. 5 indexed citations
6.
Seehagen, Sabine, Norbert Zmyj, & Jane S. Herbert. (2019). Remembering in the Context of Internal States: The Role of Sleep for Infant Memory. Child Development Perspectives. 13(2). 110–115. 14 indexed citations
7.
Teismann, Tobias, Gerrit Hirschfeld, Norbert Zmyj, et al.. (2018). The course of maternal repetitive negative thinking at the transition to motherhood and early mother–infant interactions: Is there a link?. Development and Psychopathology. 31(4). 1411–1421. 8 indexed citations
8.
Zmyj, Norbert, Axel Schölmerich, & Moritz M. Daum. (2017). The relationship between attention and deferred imitation in 12-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 48(Pt B). 175–183. 3 indexed citations
9.
Zmyj, Norbert, et al.. (2017). Social Cognition in Children Born Preterm: A Perspective on Future Research Directions. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 455–455. 31 indexed citations
10.
Hüning, Britta, et al.. (2017). Delay of gratification and time comprehension is impaired in very preterm children at the age of 4 years. Early Human Development. 115. 77–81. 7 indexed citations
11.
12.
Seehagen, Sabine, et al.. (2016). Wie du mir, so ich dir?. Zeitschrift für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie. 44(1). 31–38. 1 indexed citations
13.
Zmyj, Norbert, et al.. (2015). Dropout in looking time studies: The role of infants’ temperament and cognitive developmental status. Infant Behavior and Development. 41. 142–153. 7 indexed citations
14.
Zmyj, Norbert, Wolfgang Prinz, & Moritz M. Daum. (2013). The relation between mirror self-image reactions and imitation in 14- and 18-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development. 36(4). 809–816. 6 indexed citations
15.
Zmyj, Norbert, Gisa Aschersleben, Wolfgang Prinz, & Moritz M. Daum. (2012). The Peer Model Advantage in Infants’ Imitation of Familiar Gestures Performed by Differently Aged Models. Frontiers in Psychology. 3. 252–252. 40 indexed citations
16.
Zmyj, Norbert, et al.. (2012). Rethinking ‘Rational Imitation’ in 14-Month-Old Infants: A Perceptual Distraction Approach. PLoS ONE. 7(3). e32563–e32563. 42 indexed citations
17.
Zmyj, Norbert, Moritz M. Daum, Wolfgang Prinz, & Gisa Aschersleben. (2012). Infants’ attentional preference for object-related actions of older children compared to object-related actions of peers and adults. Infant Behavior and Development. 35(3). 533–542. 7 indexed citations
18.
Buttelmann, David & Norbert Zmyj. (2012). Evaluating the empirical evidence for the two-stage-model of infant imitation. A commentary on Paulus, Hunnius, Vissers, and Bekkering (2011). Frontiers in Psychology. 3. 512–512. 6 indexed citations
19.
Zmyj, Norbert, David Buttelmann, Malinda Carpenter, & Moritz M. Daum. (2010). The reliability of a model influences 14-month-olds’ imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 106(4). 208–220. 125 indexed citations
20.
Daum, Moritz M., Norbert Zmyj, & Gisa Aschersleben. (2008). Early ontogeny of action perception and production. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 175–186. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026