Katharina Block

1.2k total citations
21 papers, 581 citations indexed

About

Katharina Block is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Katharina Block has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 581 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Gender Studies and 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Katharina Block's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers). Katharina Block is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (8 papers) and Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers). Katharina Block collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Netherlands. Katharina Block's co-authors include Toni Schmader, Alyssa Croft, Andrew Scott Baron, Brian Lickel, Antonya Marie Gonzalez, William M. Hall, Elizabeth A. Croft, Michelle Inness, Natasza Kosakowska‐Berezecka and Renata Bongiorno and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Developmental Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Katharina Block

18 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Katharina Block Canada 11 354 337 122 79 76 21 581
Judith S. Bridges United States 13 432 1.2× 363 1.1× 77 0.6× 40 0.5× 34 0.4× 24 620
Nicole Lofaro United States 4 250 0.7× 192 0.6× 95 0.8× 23 0.3× 52 0.7× 8 413
Jill M. Coleman United States 8 128 0.4× 297 0.9× 173 1.4× 28 0.4× 76 1.0× 13 466
Kristin A. Lane United States 8 104 0.3× 267 0.8× 153 1.3× 61 0.8× 75 1.0× 8 478
Leigh S. Wilton United States 14 201 0.6× 453 1.3× 197 1.6× 22 0.3× 37 0.5× 28 606
Faye Linda Wachs United States 12 325 0.9× 283 0.8× 80 0.7× 34 0.4× 88 1.2× 22 523
Kristin Donnelly United States 7 200 0.6× 160 0.5× 100 0.8× 17 0.2× 64 0.8× 9 416
Aimee L. Belanger United States 6 154 0.4× 161 0.5× 168 1.4× 238 3.0× 131 1.7× 6 579
Kath Woodward United Kingdom 15 355 1.0× 431 1.3× 104 0.9× 44 0.6× 41 0.5× 45 613
Mindi D. Foster Canada 17 240 0.7× 467 1.4× 230 1.9× 36 0.5× 24 0.3× 29 684

Countries citing papers authored by Katharina Block

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Katharina Block's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Katharina Block with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Katharina Block more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Katharina Block

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Katharina Block. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Katharina Block. The network helps show where Katharina Block may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Katharina Block

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Katharina Block. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Katharina Block based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Katharina Block. Katharina Block is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schmader, Toni & Katharina Block. (2025). Why Do Women Care More & Men Couldn't Care Less?. Daedalus. 154(1). 82–97. 2 indexed citations
2.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (2025). Who cares about caring? Gender stereotypes about communal values emerge early and predict boys’ prosocial preferences.. Developmental Psychology. 61(3). 594–603. 3 indexed citations
3.
Laar, Colette van, et al.. (2024). MANdatory - why men need (and are needed for) gender equality progress. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1263313–1263313. 11 indexed citations
4.
Margoni, Francesco, Katharina Block, J. Kiley Hamlin, Norbert Zmyj, & Toni Schmader. (2022). Meta-analytic evidence against sex differences in infants’ and toddlers’ preference for prosocial agents.. Developmental Psychology. 59(2). 229–235.
5.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (2022). Exposure to stereotype-relevant stories shapes children’s implicit gender stereotypes. PLoS ONE. 17(8). e0271396–e0271396. 10 indexed citations
6.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (2022). Making America great for whom?: How Trump’s Presidency affected fit and national identity among targets of bias. Self and Identity. 22(3). 435–469. 3 indexed citations
7.
Gonzalez, Antonya Marie, Darko Odic, Toni Schmader, Katharina Block, & Andrew Scott Baron. (2021). The effect of gender stereotypes on young girls’ intuitive number sense. PLoS ONE. 16(10). e0258886–e0258886. 5 indexed citations
8.
Gonzalez, Antonya Marie, et al.. (2021). Measuring Implicit Gender Stereotypes Using the Preschool Auditory Stroop. Journal of Cognition and Development. 23(2). 254–272. 2 indexed citations
9.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (2019). Do people care if men don't care about caring? The asymmetry in support for changing gender roles. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 83. 112–131. 41 indexed citations
10.
Croft, Alyssa, Toni Schmader, & Katharina Block. (2018). Life in the Balance: Are Women’s Possible Selves Constrained by Men’s Domestic Involvement?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 45(5). 808–823. 21 indexed citations
11.
Block, Katharina, Alyssa Croft, & Toni Schmader. (2018). Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 48 indexed citations
12.
Block, Katharina, William M. Hall, Toni Schmader, Michelle Inness, & Elizabeth A. Croft. (2018). Should I Stay or Should I Go?. Social Psychology. 49(4). 243–251. 17 indexed citations
13.
Block, Katharina. (2016). Von der Umwelt zur Welt. transcript Verlag eBooks. 1 indexed citations
14.
Schmader, Toni & Katharina Block. (2015). Engendering Identity: Toward a Clearer Conceptualization of Gender as a Social Identity. Sex Roles. 73(11-12). 474–480. 28 indexed citations
15.
Croft, Alyssa, Toni Schmader, & Katharina Block. (2015). An Underexamined Inequality. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 19(4). 343–370. 239 indexed citations
16.
Block, Katharina. (2015). Men don't care for caring : fundamental goals and men's interest in HEED roles.. Open Collections. 1 indexed citations
17.
Schmader, Toni, Katharina Block, & Brian Lickel. (2015). Social Identity Threat in Response to Stereotypic Film Portrayals: Effects on Self‐Conscious Emotion and Implicit Ingroup Attitudes. Journal of Social Issues. 71(1). 54–72. 44 indexed citations
18.
Croft, Alyssa, Toni Schmader, Katharina Block, & Andrew Scott Baron. (2014). The Second Shift Reflected in the Second Generation. Psychological Science. 25(7). 1418–1428. 73 indexed citations
19.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (1952). Zur Physiologie des 14C-radioaktiven Mescalins im Tierversuch. III. Mitteilung: Mescalineinbau in Leberprotein. Biological Chemistry. 291(1-6). 119–128. 1 indexed citations
20.
Block, Katharina, et al.. (1952). Zur Physiologie des 14C-radioaktiven Mescalins im Tierversuch. Biological Chemistry. 290(1-6). 160–168. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026