Ian P. McCulloch
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 0.5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ulrich SchollwöckStefan DepenbrockFabian Heidrich‐MeisnerJens EisertAndreas FleschImmanuel BlochStefan TrotzkyF. Alexander Wolf
- Topics
- Quantum many-body systems (87 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (73 papers)Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (43 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ian P. McCulloch
114 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 4.5k
- Condensed Matter Physics 2.7k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 818
- Artificial Intelligence 551
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 263
Countries citing papers authored by Ian P. McCulloch
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian P. McCulloch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian P. McCulloch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian P. McCulloch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian P. McCulloch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian P. McCulloch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian P. McCulloch. The network helps show where Ian P. McCulloch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian P. McCulloch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian P. McCulloch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian P. McCulloch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian P. McCulloch. Ian P. McCulloch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 87 | |
| 11 | Nature of the Spin-Liquid Ground State of the S=1/2 Heisenberg Model on the Kagome Lattice | 20 |
| 12 | 225 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Nature of the Spin-Liquid Ground State of the | 465 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 136 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Ian P. McCulloch
Ian P. McCulloch is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 116 papers that have together received 5.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (87 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (73 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (43 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (2.7k citations), Computational Mathematics (105 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (4.5k citations). Ian P. McCulloch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich Schollwöck, Stefan Depenbrock, Fabian Heidrich‐Meisner, Jens Eisert, Andreas Flesch, Immanuel Bloch, Stefan Trotzky, F. Alexander Wolf, S. Langer and Jad C. Halimeh. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.