Noboru Nakayama
- Molecular Biology
- Geometry and Topology top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Co-authors
- Yoshiko ItezonoHiroyuku TAKEISHIKazuteru YokoseMikio ArisawaHideaki MurataKenji MatsuuraMamoru OhashiMakoto Suzuki
- Topics
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (24 papers)Advanced Algebra and Geometry (11 papers)Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Noboru Nakayama
117 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Molecular Biology 325
- Geometry and Topology 314
- Pharmacology 211
- Environmental Chemistry 208
- Organic Chemistry 196
Countries citing papers authored by Noboru Nakayama
This map shows the geographic impact of Noboru Nakayama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noboru Nakayama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noboru Nakayama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noboru Nakayama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noboru Nakayama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noboru Nakayama. The network helps show where Noboru Nakayama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noboru Nakayama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noboru Nakayama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noboru Nakayama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noboru Nakayama. Noboru Nakayama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 110 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | Quantitative approaches to plant development | 0 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | BUILDING BLOCKS OF ÉTALE ENDOMORPHISMS OF COMPLEX PROJECTIVE MANIFOLDS | 25 |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | On smooth exceptional curves in threefolds | 5 |
About Noboru Nakayama
Noboru Nakayama is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Algebra and Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, having authored 130 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (24 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (11 papers) and Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (314 citations), Mathematical Physics (190 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (208 citations). Noboru Nakayama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yoshiko Itezono, Hiroyuku TAKEISHI, Kazuteru Yokose, Mikio Arisawa, Hideaki Murata, Kenji Matsuura, Mamoru Ohashi, Makoto Suzuki, Kiyoshi OGAWA and Tetsuji Saito. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.