N.J. Tarbell

3.9k citations
81 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 28

Impact in

  • Genetics top 0.5%
    • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Neurology top 2%
    • Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments

Papers in

N.J. Tarbell

78 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

N.J. Tarbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Neurology 681
  • Ophthalmology 338
  • Radiation 241
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 891
Replace Joel W. Goldwein with:
Joel W. Goldwein United States
Karen J. Marcus United States
Jean‐Michel Zucker France
Patricia L. Robertson United States
Ibrahim Qaddoumi United States
Daniel C. Bowers United States
Beatriz E. Amendola United States
H. Stacy Nicholson United States
C Kalifa France
Anita Mahajan United States
N.J. Tarbell relative to Joel W. Goldwein United States Joel W. Goldwein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Joel W. Goldwein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N.J. Tarbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N.J. Tarbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N.J. Tarbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N.J. Tarbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N.J. Tarbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N.J. Tarbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N.J. Tarbell. The network helps show where N.J. Tarbell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N.J. Tarbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N.J. Tarbell Line = papers co-authored together N.J. Tarbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20241
3 20156
4 201422
5 201337
6 2013103
7 20131
8 200723
9 2004256
10 200078
11
Intensified therapy for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium.
199781
12 199626
13 199556
14 199530
15 1994165
16 199356
17 199348
18 199354
19 198935
20 198969

About N.J. Tarbell

N.J. Tarbell is a scholar working on Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiation, Neurology and Ophthalmology, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (42 papers), Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry (19 papers), Brain Metastases and Treatment (11 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (9 papers), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (9 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (7 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (7 papers) and Meningioma and schwannoma management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.1k citations), Neurology (681 citations), Ophthalmology (338 citations), Radiation (241 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (891 citations). N.J. Tarbell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen E. Sallan, R. Michael Scott, Jay S. Loeffler, Patrick D. Barnes, Richard D. Gelber, F. Lennie Wong, Charis Eng, Liliana Goumnerova, J. D. Boice and J.M. Seddon. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Journal of Clinical Oncology, American Journal of Neuroradiology, Journal of Neuro-Oncology and Neuro-Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026